Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24549168›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2014

CRIB--the use of cardiac rehabilitation services to aid the recovery of patients with bowel cancer: a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) with embedded feasibility study.

Julie Munro, Richard Adams, Anna Campbell, Sandra Campbell, Cam Donaldson, Jon Godwin, Sally Haw, Lisa Kidd, Chrissie Lane, Stephen J Leslie and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Julie MunroSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Richard Adams
Anna Campbell
Sandra Campbell
Cam Donaldson
Jon Godwin
Sally Haw
Lisa Kidd
Chrissie Lane
Stephen J Leslie
Helen Mason
Nanette Mutrie
Ronan O'Carroll
Cara Taylor
Shaun Treweek
Angus Watson
Gill Hubbard
Glasgow Caledonian University · GBUniversity of Stirling · GBNHS Highland · GBNHS Forth Valley · GBNHS Tayside · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBVelindre Cancer Centre · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15954Chief Scientist Office HSRU1Department of Health 12/5001/09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with colorectal cancer report ongoing physical and psychological impairments and a high proportion of these patients are overweight, insufficiently active and high-risk drinkers, putting them at risk of poor recovery and risk of recurrence and comorbidities. A challenge is implementing sustainable and effective rehabilitation as part of routine care for this group. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A two-arm pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) with embedded feasibility study undertaken as a phased programme of work. The intervention involves an existing cardiac rehabilitation programme for cardiac patients accepting colorectal cancer patient referrals. The intervention consists of supervised exercise sessions run by a cardiac physiotherapist and information sessions. Phase 1 will involve one research site enrolling 12 patients to assess intervention and study design processes. Semistructured interviews with patients with colorectal cancer and cardiac patients and clinicians will be used to gather data on acceptability of the intervention and study procedures. Phase 2 will involve three sites enrolling 66 patients with colorectal cancer randomised to control or intervention groups. Outcome measures will be taken preintervention and postintervention, for phases 1 and 2. The primary outcome is accelerometer measured physical activity; secondary outcomes are self-report physical activity, quality of life, anxiety, depression, symptoms including fatigue. The following variables will also be examined to determine if these factors influence adherence and outcomes: self-efficacy, risk perception and treatments. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Full ethical approval was granted by NRES Committees-North of Scotland (13/NS/0004; IRAS project ID: 121757) on 22 February 2013. The proposed work is novel in that it aims to test the feasibility and acceptability of using an evidence-based and theory driven existing cardiac rehabilitation service with patients with colorectal cancer. Should this model of rehabilitation prove to be clinically and cost effective we aim to conduct a randomised controlled trial of this intervention to measure effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION REFERENCE: ISRCTN63510637; UKCRN id 14092.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyPatient Education as TopicAnxietyColorectal NeoplasmsDepressionFatigueFeasibility StudiesHeart DiseasesHumansMotor ActivityPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeResearch DesignREHABILITATION MEDICINESPORTS MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID24549168
PMCPMC3931997
OpenAlexW2119483284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.