Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24549055›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2014

Next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture targeting multiple candidate genes.

Laurent Castéra, Sophie Krieger, Antoine Rousselin, Angélina Legros, Jean-Jacques Baumann, Olivia Bruet, Baptiste Brault, Robin Fouillet, Nicolas Goardon, Olivier Letac and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
27.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 255 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Summary ofGenes · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Marginal Contribution of PathogenicJournal of cancer & allied specialties · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laurent Castéra1] Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CLCC François Baclesse, Caen, France [2] Inserm U1079, Rouen, France.
Sophie Krieger1] Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CLCC François Baclesse, Caen, France [2] Inserm U1079, Rouen, France [3] Department of Biochemistry and Toxicology, Caen University, Caen, France.
Antoine RousselinDepartment of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CLCC François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Angélina LegrosDepartment of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CLCC François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Jean-Jacques BaumannDepartment of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CLCC François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Olivia BruetDepartment of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CLCC François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Baptiste BraultDepartment of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CLCC François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Robin FouilletDepartment of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CLCC François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Nicolas GoardonDepartment of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CLCC François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Olivier LetacDepartment of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CLCC François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Stéphanie Baert-Desurmont1] Inserm U1079, Rouen, France [2] Department of Genetics, University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Julie Tinat1] Inserm U1079, Rouen, France [2] Department of Genetics, University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Odile BeraDepartment of Genetics, University Hospital, Fort-de-France, France.
Catherine DugastDepartment of Genetics, University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Pascaline BerthetDepartment of Genetics, CLCC François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Florence PolycarpeDepartment of Genetics, CLCC François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Valérie LayetDepartment of Genetics, Jacques Monod Hospital, Le Havre, France.
Agnes Hardouin1] Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CLCC François Baclesse, Caen, France [2] Inserm U1079, Rouen, France.
Thierry Frébourg1] Inserm U1079, Rouen, France [2] Department of Genetics, University Hospital, Rouen, France [3] Rouen University, IRIB, Rouen, France.
Dominique Vaur1] Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CLCC François Baclesse, Caen, France [2] Inserm U1079, Rouen, France.
Centre François Baclesse · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To optimize the molecular diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), we developed a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based screening based on the capture of a panel of genes involved, or suspected to be involved in HBOC, on pooling of indexed DNA and on paired-end sequencing in an Illumina GAIIx platform, followed by confirmation by Sanger sequencing or MLPA/QMPSF. The bioinformatic pipeline included CASAVA, NextGENe, CNVseq and Alamut-HT. We validated this procedure by the analysis of 59 patients' DNAs harbouring SNVs, indels or large genomic rearrangements of BRCA1 or BRCA2. We also conducted a blind study in 168 patients comparing NGS versus Sanger sequencing or MLPA analyses of BRCA1 and BRCA2. All mutations detected by conventional procedures were detected by NGS. We then screened, using three different versions of the capture set, a large series of 708 consecutive patients. We detected in these patients 69 germline deleterious alterations within BRCA1 and BRCA2, and 4 TP53 mutations in 468 patients also tested for this gene. We also found 36 variations inducing either a premature codon stop or a splicing defect among other genes: 5/708 in CHEK2, 3/708 in RAD51C, 1/708 in RAD50, 7/708 in PALB2, 3/708 in MRE11A, 5/708 in ATM, 3/708 in NBS1, 1/708 in CDH1, 3/468 in MSH2, 2/468 in PMS2, 1/708 in BARD1, 1/468 in PMS1 and 1/468 in MLH3. These results demonstrate the efficiency of NGS in performing molecular diagnosis of HBOC. Detection of mutations within other genes than BRCA1 and BRCA2 highlights the genetic heterogeneity of HBOC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsBreast Neoplasms, MaleCase-Control StudiesComputational BiologyFemaleGene RearrangementGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID24549055
PMCPMC4200427
OpenAlexW2113240710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.