ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2014
Impact of Telemedicine on Access to Acute Stroke Care in the State of Texas.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Telestroke activity across Europe; The results of a European Stroke Organization survey.Frontiers in stroke · 2023Article
- Rationale and design of a statewide telestroke registry: Lone Star Stroke Consortium Telestroke Registry (LeSteR).BMJ open · 2019Article
- Telemedicine Training in Undergraduate Medical Education: Mixed-Methods Review.JMIR medical education · 2019Review
- Article
- Article
- The effects of telemedicine on racial and ethnic disparities in access to acute stroke care.Journal of telemedicine and telecare · 2016Article
- Sex Disparities in Access to Acute Stroke Care: Can Telemedicine Mitigate this Effect?Journal of health disparities research and practice · 2016Article
- The Effect of Telemedicine on Access to Acute Stroke Care in Texas: The Story of Age Inequalities.Stroke research and treatment · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo examine the impact of telemedicine on access to acute stroke care and expertise in the state of Texas.
methodsTexas hospitals were surveyed using a standard questionnaire and categorized as: (1) stand-alone Primary Stroke Centers not using telemedicine for acute stroke care, (2) Primary Stroke Centers using telemedicine for acute stroke care, (3) non-Primary Stroke Center hospitals using telemedicine for acute stroke care, or (4) non-Primary Stroke Center hospitals not using telemedicine for acute stroke care. Population data were obtained from the US Census Bureau and the Neilson Claritas Demographic Estimation Program. Access within 60 minutes to a designated facility was calculated at the block group level.
resultsOver 75% of Texans had 60-minute access to a stand-alone Primary Stroke Center. Including Primary Stroke Centers using telemedicine increased access by 6.5%. Adding non- Primary Stroke Centers that use telemedicine for acute stroke care provided 60-minute access for an additional 2% of Texans, leaving 16% of Texans without 60-minute access to acute stroke care. Approximately 62% of Texans had 60-minute access to more than one type of facility that provided acute stroke care.
conclusionThe use of telemedicine in the state of Texas brought 60-minute access to >2 million Texans who otherwise would not have had access to acute stroke expertise. Our findings demonstrate that using telemedicine for acute stroke has the ability to provide neurologically underserved areas access to acute stroke care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.