ArticleJournal of applied genetics2014
Considering specific clinical features as evidence of pathogenic copy number variants.
Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic and clinical utility of exome sequencing and chromosomal microarray in children with GDD/iD: a meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- A cohort study of neurodevelopmental disorders and/or congenital anomalies using high resolution chromosomal microarrays in southern Brazil highlighting the significance of ASD.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Pathogenic Copy Number Variations Involved in the Genetic Etiology of Syndromic and Non-Syndromic Intellectual Disability-Data from a Romanian Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Genetic Testing in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Review
- A case report of familial 4q13.3 microdeletion in three individuals with syndromic intellectual disability.BMC medical genomics · 2020Article
- Copy Number Variations in a Cohort of 420 Individuals with Neurodevelopmental Disorders From the South of Brazil.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Review
- Prematurity, ventricular septal defect and dysmorphisms are independent predictors of pathogenic copy number variants: a retrospective study on array-CGH results and phenotypical features of 293 children with neurodevelopmental disorders and/or multiple congenital anomalies.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2018Article
- Rare Copy Number Variations and Predictors in Children With Intellectual Disability and Epilepsy.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- CNV analysis in the Lithuanian population.BMC genetics · 2016Article
- Single gene microdeletions and microduplication of 3p26.3 in three unrelated families: CNTN6 as a new candidate gene for intellectual disability.Molecular cytogenetics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the introduction of high-resolution microarray technologies, it has become apparent that structural chromosomal rearrangements can lead to a wide variety of clinical manifestations, including developmental delay/intellectual disability (DD/ID). It has been shown previously that the diagnostic yield of genome-wide array-based identification of submicroscopic alterations in patients with ID varies widely and depends on the patient selection criteria. More attempts have recently been made to define the phenotypic clues of pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs). The aim of this study was to investigate a well-phenotyped cohort of patients with DD/ID and determine whether certain clinical features may serve as indicators for pathogenic CNVs. A retrospective analysis was conducted for patients with DD/ID (n = 211) who were tested using genome-wide chromosomal microarray technologies and a review of the clinical data was performed. Pathogenic CNVs were detected in 29 patients. In comparison with individuals who had normal molecular karyotyping results (n = 182), malformations of the musculoskeletal system; congenital malformations of the CNS (particularly hydrocephalus and congenital malformations of the corpus callosum); minor anomalies of the eye, face, and neck subgroup (particularly downward-slanting palpebral fissures, minor anomalies of the ear, and micrognathia); brachydactyly; and umbilical hernia were more common in patients with chromosomal alterations. A multivariate logistic regression analysis allowed the identification of three independent pathogenic CNV predictors: congenital malformations of the corpus callosum, minor anomalies of the ear, and brachydactyly. Insights into the chromosomal phenotype may help to increase the diagnostic yield of microarray technologies and sharpen the distinction between chromosomal alterations and other conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.