Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24535828›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied genetics2014

Considering specific clinical features as evidence of pathogenic copy number variants.

Egle Preiksaitiene, Alma Molytė, Jurate Kasnauskiene, Zivile Ciuladaite, Algirdas Utkus, Philippos C Patsalis, Vaidutis Kučinskas

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Egle PreiksaitieneDepartment of Human and Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Santariškių st. 2, 08661, Vilnius, Lithuania, eglepreiksaitiene@gmail.com.
Alma Molytė
Jurate Kasnauskiene
Zivile Ciuladaite
Algirdas Utkus
Philippos C Patsalis
Vaidutis Kučinskas
Vilnius University · LTCyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics · CY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the introduction of high-resolution microarray technologies, it has become apparent that structural chromosomal rearrangements can lead to a wide variety of clinical manifestations, including developmental delay/intellectual disability (DD/ID). It has been shown previously that the diagnostic yield of genome-wide array-based identification of submicroscopic alterations in patients with ID varies widely and depends on the patient selection criteria. More attempts have recently been made to define the phenotypic clues of pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs). The aim of this study was to investigate a well-phenotyped cohort of patients with DD/ID and determine whether certain clinical features may serve as indicators for pathogenic CNVs. A retrospective analysis was conducted for patients with DD/ID (n = 211) who were tested using genome-wide chromosomal microarray technologies and a review of the clinical data was performed. Pathogenic CNVs were detected in 29 patients. In comparison with individuals who had normal molecular karyotyping results (n = 182), malformations of the musculoskeletal system; congenital malformations of the CNS (particularly hydrocephalus and congenital malformations of the corpus callosum); minor anomalies of the eye, face, and neck subgroup (particularly downward-slanting palpebral fissures, minor anomalies of the ear, and micrognathia); brachydactyly; and umbilical hernia were more common in patients with chromosomal alterations. A multivariate logistic regression analysis allowed the identification of three independent pathogenic CNV predictors: congenital malformations of the corpus callosum, minor anomalies of the ear, and brachydactyly. Insights into the chromosomal phenotype may help to increase the diagnostic yield of microarray technologies and sharpen the distinction between chromosomal alterations and other conditions.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolChromosome AberrationsCluster AnalysisDevelopmental DisabilitiesDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHumansInfantIntellectual DisabilityLogistic ModelsMaleMultivariate AnalysisTranslocation, GeneticYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24535828
OpenAlexW2069189455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.