Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24535654›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2014

Treatment of methamphetamine-induced psychosis: a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing haloperidol and quetiapine.

Viroj Verachai, Warangkana Rukngan, Kachornwan Chawanakrasaesin, Sumnao Nilaban, Somporn Suwanmajo, Rossukon Thanateerabunjong, Jaranit Kaewkungwal, Rasmon Kalayasiri

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Pharmacotherapy treatment of stimulant use disorder.The mental health clinician · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Methamphetamine-induced psychosis: Clinical features, treatment modalities and outcomes.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Roles of sigma-1 receptors in Alzheimer's disease.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Viroj VerachaiThanyarak Institute on Drug Abuse, Thailand Ministry of Public Health, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Warangkana Rukngan
Kachornwan Chawanakrasaesin
Sumnao Nilaban
Somporn Suwanmajo
Rossukon Thanateerabunjong
Jaranit Kaewkungwal
Rasmon Kalayasiri
Thanyarak Institute · THMinistry of Public Health · THChulalongkorn University · THMahidol University · TH

Funding

Thai-US Drug Dependence Genetics Research Training GrantD43TW006166 · FIC · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GELERNTER, JOEL · 2002 to 2006
$1.7M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW006166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleTo our knowledge, only a few double-blind randomized controlled trials with antipsychotic drugs have been conducted to examine the treatment of methamphetamine-induced psychosis (MAP).

objectivesThe aims of this study are to compare the antipsychotic and adverse events of quetiapine, an atypical antipsychotic drug, to haloperidol, a standard treatment for primary psychotic disorder, in individuals with MAP.

methodsEighty individuals with MAP were randomly assigned into two groups, i.e. treatment with quetiapine (n = 36) and haloperidol (n = 44). Sixty-eight patients (85 %) completed the study protocol, i.e. treatment with quetiapine at least 100 mg per day or haloperidol at least 2 mg per day orally once a day for 4 weeks. The doses were increased every 5 days until no psychotic symptom was observed from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Data were analysed by survival analysis with Cox's proportional regression analysis, general estimating equations and log-rank tests.

resultsThirty-two (89 %) subjects from the quetiapine group and 37 subjects (84 %) from the haloperidol group met the remission criteria at the end of the study. Baseline PANSS total scores of quetiapine and haloperidol groups were 82.4 ± 16.6 and 90.0 ± 18.4, respectively (mean ± SD; p = 0.06). The change-from-baseline scores were -47.8 for the quetiapine group and -53.2 for the haloperidol group. There were no significant differences between the antipsychotic effects (coefficient value = -2.6, p = 0.32, 95%CI = -7.6, 2.5) and the adverse effects of quetiapine and haloperidol.

conclusionsQuetiapine may be used as an antipsychotic treatment for MAP with comparable therapeutic effects and adverse events to treatment with classical antipsychotic drugs.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System StimulantsMethamphetamineAdolescentAdultAge of OnsetAntipsychotic AgentsDibenzothiazepinesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHaloperidolHumansMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychoses, Substance-InducedQuetiapine FumarateSocioeconomic FactorsAntipsychotic AgentsCentral Nervous System StimulantsDibenzothiazepinesHaloperidolMethamphetamineQuetiapine Fumarate

Identifiers

PMID24535654
OpenAlexW2088092711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.