Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24535469›Full record

ReviewEndocrine2014

New guidelines for metabolic targets in diabetes: clinician's opinion does matter.

Katherine Esposito, Maria Ida Maiorino, Giuseppe Bellastella, Dario Giugliano

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine EspositoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Maria Ida Maiorino
Giuseppe Bellastella
Dario Giugliano
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine replaced eminence-based medicine as a way to manage unavoidable clinical uncertainty. Moving away from "one-size-fits-all" medicine, personalized medicine seemed to have the potential of tailoring therapies to subsets of patients. Despite the rapid progress in drug development for diabetes, it is still challenging to achieve good glycemic control in a substantial population. Different diabetes management algorithms have been proposed: most agree with a HbA1c target of <7.0 % for the majority of people with diabetes, except the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) that claims for a lower HbA1c target (<6.5 %). The recently released American guidelines on the treatment of blood cholesterol recommends moderate-intensity statin therapy for primary prevention for persons aged 40-75 years with type 1 or 2 diabetes and LDL-cholesterol levels between 70 and 189 mg/dl. The Eighth Joint National Committee recommends pharmacologic treatment in the population aged 18 years or older with diabetes, with a goal systolic blood pressure of lower than 140 mmHg and a goal diastolic blood pressure lower than 90 mmHg. There are differences and similarities among these recent guidelines for people with diabetes, with the main differences related to the level of the evidence. There are recommendations based on expert opinions (insufficient evidence or existing evidence unclear or conflicting) in almost all guidelines. The ultimate decision about care of a particular patient is left to clinicians, as the way to manage unavoidable guideline uncertainty: clinician's opinion does matter.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementBlood GlucoseDiabetes MellitusEvidence-Based MedicineGlycated HemoglobinHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Precision MedicineBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID24535469
OpenAlexW2034882494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.