Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24535425›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in organ transplantation2014

Classic and current opinion in embryonic organ transplantation.

Marc R Hammerman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in organ transplantation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Underpinnings of cellular organ replacement therapies.Current opinion in organ transplantation · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marc R HammermanDepartments of Medicine, and Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Kidney Disease ResearchP30DK079333 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HAMMERMAN, MARC RANDALL · 2007 to 2011
$5.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHere, we review the rationale for the use of organs from embryonic donors, antecedent investigations and recent work from our own laboratory, exploring the utility for transplantation of embryonic kidney and pancreas as an organ replacement therapy. RECENT

findingsUltrastructurally precise kidneys differentiate in situ in rats following xenotransplantation in mesentery of embryonic pig renal primordia. The developing organ attracts its blood supply from the host. Engraftment of pig renal primordia requires host immune suppression. However, beta cells originating from embryonic pig pancreas obtained very early following initiation of organogenesis [embryonic day 28 (E28)] engraft long term in nonimmune-suppressed diabetic rats or rhesus macaques. Engraftment of morphologically similar cells originating from adult porcine islets of Langerhans occurs in animals previously transplanted with E28 pig pancreatic primordia. SUMMARY: Organ primordia engraft, attract a host vasculature and differentiate following transplantation to ectopic sites. Attempts have been made to exploit these characteristics to achieve clinically relevant endpoints for end-stage renal disease and diabetes mellitus using animal models. We and others have focused on use of the embryonic pig as a donor.

Indexed as

Fetal Tissue TransplantationRenal Replacement TherapyAnimalsHumansKidneyKidney Failure, ChronicOrganogenesisTissue DonorsTransplantation, Heterologous

Identifiers

PMID24535425
PMCPMC4094307
OpenAlexW2033759057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.