Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24535394›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

Food security in a perfect storm: using the ecosystem services framework to increase understanding.

G M Poppy, S Chiotha, F Eigenbrod, C A Harvey, M Honzák, M D Hudson, A Jarvis, N J Madise, K Schreckenberg, C M Shackleton and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mapping the "Supply-Demand-Flow" of Ecosystem Services for Ecosystem Management in China.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. New perspectives in ecosystem services science as instruments to understand environmental securities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Article
  17. Achieving food and environmental security: new approaches to close the gap.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

G M PoppyCentre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, , Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
S Chiotha
F Eigenbrod
C A Harvey
M Honzák
M D Hudson
A Jarvis
N J Madise
K Schreckenberg
C M Shackleton
F Villa
T P Dawson

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/00004945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving food security in a 'perfect storm' scenario is a grand challenge for society. Climate change and an expanding global population act in concert to make global food security even more complex and demanding. As achieving food security and the millennium development goal (MDG) to eradicate hunger influences the attainment of other MDGs, it is imperative that we offer solutions which are complementary and do not oppose one another. Sustainable intensification of agriculture has been proposed as a way to address hunger while also minimizing further environmental impact. However, the desire to raise productivity and yields has historically led to a degraded environment, reduced biodiversity and a reduction in ecosystem services (ES), with the greatest impacts affecting the poor. This paper proposes that the ES framework coupled with a policy response framework, for example Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR), can allow food security to be delivered alongside healthy ecosystems, which provide many other valuable services to humankind. Too often, agro-ecosystems have been considered as separate from other natural ecosystems and insufficient attention has been paid to the way in which services can flow to and from the agro-ecosystem to surrounding ecosystems. Highlighting recent research in a large multi-disciplinary project (ASSETS), we illustrate the ES approach to food security using a case study from the Zomba district of Malawi.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemPopulation GrowthAgricultureConservation of Natural ResourcesFood SupplyMalawiagriculture–forest interfaceecosystem servicesfood securityMalawimodels

Identifiers

PMID24535394
PMCPMC3928891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.