Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24535389›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

Delivering sustainable crop protection systems via the seed: exploiting natural constitutive and inducible defence pathways.

John A Pickett, Gudbjorg I Aradottír, Michael A Birkett, Toby J A Bruce, Antony M Hooper, Charles A O Midega, Huw D Jones, Michaela C Matthes, Johnathan A Napier, Jimmy O Pittchar and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Achieving food and environmental security: new approaches to close the gap.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

John A PickettRothamsted Research, , Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK.
Gudbjorg I Aradottír
Michael A Birkett
Toby J A Bruce
Antony M Hooper
Charles A O Midega
Huw D Jones
Michaela C Matthes
Johnathan A Napier
Jimmy O Pittchar
Lesley E Smart
Christine M Woodcock
Zeyaur R Khan
Rothamsted Research · GBInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology · KE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F003986/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G004781/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBH0017/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I002278/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J011371/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To reduce the need for seasonal inputs, crop protection will have to be delivered via the seed and other planting material. Plant secondary metabolism can be harnessed for this purpose by new breeding technologies, genetic modification and companion cropping, the latter already on-farm in sub-Saharan Africa. Secondary metabolites offer the prospect of pest management as robust as that provided by current pesticides, for which many lead compounds were, or are currently deployed as, natural products. Evidence of success and promise is given for pest management in industrial and developing agriculture. Additionally, opportunities for solving wider problems of sustainable crop protection, and also production, are discussed.

Indexed as

Population GrowthAgricultureAnimalsAphidsBreedingPest Control, BiologicalPheromonesPlants, Genetically ModifiedSeedsPheromonesbreedingcrop protectiongenetic modificationpest managementpush–pull technologysustainability

Identifiers

PMID24535389
PMCPMC3928886
OpenAlexW2138542632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.