Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24535204›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2014

[Variocele in adolescents].

A Kaminsky, H Sperling

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A KaminskyKlinik für Urologie, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Viersener Straße 450, 41063, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland, angelika.kaminsky@mariahilf.de.
H Sperling
Kliniken Maria Hilf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Up to 20% of adolescents have a varicocele. Often a varicocele is an incidental finding during a physical examination. However, adolescents with a varicocele might suffer from pain or they may have noticed a difference in the volume of the testes. The diagnostic investigation of the ejaculate in adolescents is difficult because no age-dependent spermiogram standard values exist. Endocrinological tests are also difficult because of the physiological variability of testosterone and gonadotropins during adolescence. The difference in testes volume normalizes in half of the boys without any therapy during maturation. Most adolescents with a varicocele have a normal semen analysis. The sperm parameters are the most important factor for treatment decision making.If sperm concentration, motility, and morphology are normal, active surveillance with regular control examinations are recommended even if the volume of the testis is divergent. Pathologic sperm parameters should lead to an operative treatment. The microsurgical subinguinal technique is the method of choice due to the low complication and reoperation rates. The sperm concentration, morphology, and motility increase postoperatively as well as the volume of the testis. It is not clear whether the improved sperm parameters lead to improved spontaneous pregnancy rates later in life. Whether scrotal pain decreases after operative therapy is uncertain because of the subjectivity of pain.Until now there are only a few studies with small and very heterogeneous case numbers so that no clear recommendation for the treatment of a varicocele in adolescents can be made. The difficulty in the treatment decision-making is preventing reduced fertility, while avoiding overtreatment.

Indexed as

AdolescentHumansInfertility, MaleMaleVaricocele

Identifiers

PMID24535204
OpenAlexW181493772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.