Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24534891›Full record

Trial reportOncology reports2014

Feasibility of concervative breast surgery and intraoperative radiation therapy for early breast cancer: a single-center, open, non-randomized, prospective pilot study.

Carla Cedolini, Serena Bertozzi, Luca Seriau, Ambrogio P Londero, Serena Concina, Eugenia Moretti, Renato Padovani, Alberto Pasqualucci, Tino Ceschia, Andrea Risaliti

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carla CedoliniClinic of Surgery, University of Udine, I-33100 Udine, Italy.
Serena BertozziClinic of Surgery, University of Udine, I-33100 Udine, Italy.
Luca SeriauClinic of Surgery, University of Udine, I-33100 Udine, Italy.
Ambrogio P LonderoClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Udine, I-33100 Udine, Italy.
Serena ConcinaClinic of Surgery, University of Udine, I-33100 Udine, Italy.
Eugenia MorettiDepartment of Medical Physics, AOU 'Santa Maria della Misericordia', I-33100 Udine, Italy.
Renato PadovaniDepartment of Medical Physics, AOU 'Santa Maria della Misericordia', I-33100 Udine, Italy.
Alberto PasqualucciDepartment of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, I-06123 Perugia, Italy.
Tino CeschiaDepartment of Radiotherapy, AOU 'Santa Maria della Misericordia', I-33100 Udine, Italy.
Andrea RisalitiClinic of Surgery, University of Udine, I-33100 Udine, Italy.
University of Udine · ITOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · ITUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) consists of an accelerated, single-dose, partial breast irradiation, performed immediately after breast conservative surgery. In the present study, we report the results of our feasibility protocol study using IORT between 2005 and 2009. We analyzed the data from a single-center, open, non-randomized, prospective pilot study including patients who underwent breast conservative surgery for invasive breast cancer between January 2005 and December 2009 at our Clinic of Surgery. Patients were divided based on IORT performance and stratified by age (≥48 or <48 years). Data were analyzed using R (version 2.15.2), considering a level of significance at p<0.05. Among the 247 eligible patients, 81 accepted the IORT protocol. Intraoperative IORT feasibility was 95.1% (77/81). In 71.4% (55/77) of the cases no postoperative complication was registered. Concerning local recurrence and overall survival, no significant difference was observed between women who underwent the IORT protocol or standard treatment. Among the patients aged <48 years, no local recurrence was noted after IORT protocol, and among women aged ≥48, local recurrences developed later in patients treated with IORT than with standard treatment. IORT represents a feasible and promising technique for the treatment of early breast cancer, with low morbidity, and beneficial aesthetic and oncologic results. Further studies are required in order to extend the inclusion criteria and offer IORT to a larger number of breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCombined Modality TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIntraoperative PeriodKaplan-Meier EstimateMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPilot ProjectsRadiotherapy, Adjuvant

Identifiers

PMID24534891
PMCPMC3975985
OpenAlexW2015339452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.