Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24534807›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2014

Multipose binding in molecular docking.

Kalina Atkovska, Sergey A Samsonov, Maciej Paszkowski-Rogacz, M Teresa Pisabarro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Density Functional Theory, Molecular Docking Study, andBiochemistry research international · 2025
    Article
  9. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antifungal Constituents ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Molecular Modeling-Guided Design of Phospholipid-Based Prodrugs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kalina AtkovskaStructural Bioinformatics, BIOTEC TU Dresden, Tatzberg 47-51, Dresden 01307, Germany. katkovs@gwdg.de.
Sergey A SamsonovStructural Bioinformatics, BIOTEC TU Dresden, Tatzberg 47-51, Dresden 01307, Germany. sergeys@biotec.tu-dresden.de.
Maciej Paszkowski-RogaczDepartment of Medical Systems Biology, TU Dresden, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden 01307, Germany. maciej.paszkowski-rogacz@tu-dresden.de.
M Teresa PisabarroStructural Bioinformatics, BIOTEC TU Dresden, Tatzberg 47-51, Dresden 01307, Germany. mayte@biotec.tu-dresden.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular docking has been extensively applied in virtual screening of small molecule libraries for lead identification and optimization. A necessary prerequisite for successful differentiation between active and non-active ligands is the accurate prediction of their binding affinities in the complex by use of docking scoring functions. However, many studies have shown rather poor correlations between docking scores and experimental binding affinities. Our work aimed to improve this correlation by implementing a multipose binding concept in the docking scoring scheme. Multipose binding, i.e., the property of certain protein-ligand complexes to exhibit different ligand binding modes, has been shown to occur in nature for a variety of molecules. We conducted a high-throughput docking study and implemented multipose binding in the scoring procedure by considering multiple docking solutions in binding affinity prediction. In general, improvement of the agreement between docking scores and experimental data was observed, and this was most pronounced in complexes with large and flexible ligands and high binding affinities. Further developments of the selection criteria for docking solutions for each individual complex are still necessary for a general utilization of the multipose binding concept for accurate binding affinity prediction by molecular docking.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationHIV ProteaseHIV Protease InhibitorsLigandsPeptidesPrincipal Component AnalysisProtein BindingProteinsSmall Molecule LibrariesSoftwaresrc Homology DomainsHIV ProteaseHIV Protease InhibitorsLigandsPeptidesProteinsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID24534807
PMCPMC3958872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.