Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24534444›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2014

Using patient lists to add value to integrated data repositories.

Ted D Wade, Pearlanne T Zelarney, Richard C Hum, Sylvia McGee, Deborah H Batson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ted D WadeDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO 80206, USA. Electronic address: wadet@njhealth.org.
Pearlanne T ZelarneyDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO 80206, USA.
Richard C HumDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO 80206, USA.
Sylvia McGeeDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO 80206, USA.
Deborah H BatsonDepartment of Research Informatics, Children's Hospital Colorado Research Institute, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR025780 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2008 to 2011
$61.3M
Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025780NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR025780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient lists are project-specific sets of patients that can be queried in integrated data repositories (IDR's). By allowing a set of patients to be an addition to the qualifying conditions of a query, returned results will refer to, and only to, that set of patients. We report a variety of use cases for such lists, including: restricting retrospective chart review to a defined set of patients; following a set of patients for practice management purposes; distributing "honest-brokered" (deidentified) data; adding phenotypes to biosamples; and enhancing the content of study or registry data. Among the capabilities needed to implement patient lists in an IDR are: capture of patient identifiers from a query and feedback of these into the IDR; the existence of a permanent internal identifier in the IDR that is mappable to external identifiers; the ability to add queryable attributes to the IDR; the ability to merge data from multiple queries; and suitable control over user access and de-identification of results. We implemented patient lists in a custom IDR of our own design. We reviewed capabilities of other published IDRs for focusing on sets of patients. The widely used i2b2 IDR platform has various ways to address patient sets, and it could be modified to add the low-overhead version of patient lists that we describe.

Indexed as

Database Management SystemsElectronic Health RecordsBiomedical ResearchConfidentialityHumansMedical InformaticsBio-repositoryHonest brokeri2b2Integrated data repositoryMeaningful usePatient registry

Identifiers

PMID24534444
PMCPMC4134416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.