Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24533792›Full record

Trial reportBMC family practice2014

Irrational prescribing of over-the-counter (OTC) medicines in general practice: testing the feasibility of an educational intervention among physicians in five European countries.

Christos Lionis, Elena Petelos, Sue Shea, Georgia Bagiartaki, Ioanna G Tsiligianni, Apostolos Kamekis, Vasiliki Tsiantou, Maria Papadakaki, Athina Tatsioni, Joanna Moschandreas and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC family practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Christos LionisClinic of Social and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Voutes, PO BOX 2208, Heraklion, P,C, 71003, Greece. lionis@galinos.med.uoc.gr.
Elena Petelos
Sue Shea
Georgia Bagiartaki
Ioanna G Tsiligianni
Apostolos Kamekis
Vasiliki Tsiantou
Maria Papadakaki
Athina Tatsioni
Joanna Moschandreas
Aristoula Saridaki
Antonios Bertsias
Tomas Faresjö
Ashild Faresjö
Luc Martinez
Dominic Agius
Yesim Uncu
George Samoutis
Jiri Vlcek
Abobakr Abasaeed
Bodossakis Merkouris
University of Crete · GRCharles University · CZLinköping University · SEGreek Association of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders · GRMediterranean Institute for Primary Care · MTNational School of Public Health · GRSorbonne Université · FRUniversity of Ioannina · GRUniversity of Nicosia · CY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIrrational prescribing of over-the-counter (OTC) medicines in general practice is common in Southern Europe. Recent findings from a research project funded by the European Commission (FP7), the "OTC SOCIOMED", conducted in seven European countries, indicate that physicians in countries in the Mediterranean Europe region prescribe medicines to a higher degree in comparison to physicians in other participating European countries. In light of these findings, a feasibility study has been designed to explore the acceptance of a pilot educational intervention targeting physicians in general practice in various settings in the Mediterranean Europe region.

methodsThis feasibility study utilized an educational intervention was designed using the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). It took place in geographically-defined primary care areas in Cyprus, France, Greece, Malta, and Turkey. General Practitioners (GPs) were recruited in each country and randomly assigned into two study groups in each of the participating countries. The intervention included a one-day intensive training programme, a poster presentation, and regular visits of trained professionals to the workplaces of participants. Reminder messages and email messages were, also, sent to participants over a 4-week period. A pre- and post-test evaluation study design with quantitative and qualitative data was employed. The primary outcome of this feasibility pilot intervention was to reduce GPs' intention to provide medicines following the educational intervention, and its secondary outcomes included a reduction of prescribed medicines following the intervention, as well as an assessment of its practicality and acceptance by the participating GPs.

resultsMedian intention scores in the intervention groups were reduced, following the educational intervention, in comparison to the control group. Descriptive analysis of related questions indicated a high overall acceptance and perceived practicality of the intervention programme by GPs, with median scores above 5 on a 7-point Likert scale.

conclusionsEvidence from this intervention will estimate the parameters required to design a larger study aimed at assessing the effectiveness of such educational interventions. In addition, it could also help inform health policy makers and decision makers regarding the management of behavioural changes in the prescribing patterns of physicians in Mediterranean Europe, particularly in Southern European countries.

Indexed as

Nonprescription DrugsPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultEuropeFeasibility StudiesFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleMiddle AgedNonprescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID24533792
PMCPMC3936810
OpenAlexW2043825539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.