Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24533340›Full record

ReviewInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife2013

Neglected wild life: Parasitic biodiversity as a conservation target.

Andrés Gómez, Elizabeth Nichols

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sublethal effects of parasitism on ruminants can have cascading consequences for ecosystems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Long-term trends in parasite diversity and infection levels: approaches and patterns.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Silent predators: Revealing the parasites of Himalayan musk deer (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. An interdisciplinary approach to improving conservation outcomes for parasites.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Parasites of reptiles in Iran (1922-2023): A literature review.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Equal rights for parasites: Are we there yet?International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Parasites of Astyanax lacustris (Pisces, Characiformes) from Brazilian streams.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2024
    Article
  19. "Till death do us apart": The common destiny of brown hare and its parasite community.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrés GómezAmerican Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA.
Elizabeth NicholsLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK ; Department of Ecology, Institute of Bioscience, University of São Paulo, 05508-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasites appropriate host resources to feed and/or to reproduce, and lower host fitness to varying degrees. As a consequence, they can negatively impact human and animal health, food production, economic trade, and biodiversity conservation. They can also be difficult to study and have historically been regarded as having little influence on ecosystem organization and function. Not surprisingly, parasitic biodiversity has to date not been the focus of much positive attention from the conservation community. However, a growing body of evidence demonstrates that parasites are extremely diverse, have key roles in ecological and evolutionary processes, and that infection may paradoxically result in ecosystem services of direct human relevance. Here we argue that wildlife parasites should be considered meaningful conservation targets no less relevant than their hosts. We discuss their numerical and functional importance, current conservation status, and outline a series of non-trivial challenges to consider before incorporating parasite biodiversity in conservation strategies. We also suggest that addressing the key knowledge gaps and communication deficiencies that currently impede broad discussions about parasite conservation requires input from wildlife parasitologists.

Indexed as

Co-ExtinctionConservation strategyDependent taxaEcosystem serviceIntrinsic valueMacroparasiteMicroparasite

Identifiers

PMID24533340
PMCPMC3862516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.