Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24533275›Full record

ReviewInternational journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance2012

Moxidectin and the avermectins: Consanguinity but not identity.

Roger Prichard, Cécile Ménez, Anne Lespine

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
24.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 430 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. IvermectinParasitology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Anthelmintic resistance to ivermectin and moxidectin in gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle in Europe.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2015
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Iatrogenic doramectin poisoning in newborn beef calves.Veterinary research communications · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Efficacy of a single-dose topical formulation combining Fipronil, Moxidectin and Praziquantel against natural infestations of Notoedres cati, Otodectes cynotis and Felicola subrostratus in cats.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Why Do FilamentousAnnual review of microbiology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Efficacy of 2-undecanol produced byMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Roger PrichardInstitute of Parasitology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Cécile MénezINRA, UMR 1331, Toxalim, Research Centre in Food Toxicology, F-31027 Toulouse, France ; Université de Toulouse, INP, UMR 1331, Toxalim, F-31000 Toulouse, France.
Anne LespineINRA, UMR 1331, Toxalim, Research Centre in Food Toxicology, F-31027 Toulouse, France ; Université de Toulouse, INP, UMR 1331, Toxalim, F-31000 Toulouse, France.
McGill University · CAToxalim Research Centre in Food Toxicology · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The avermectins and milbemycins contain a common macrocyclic lactone (ML) ring, but are fermentation products of different organisms. The principal structural difference is that avermectins have sugar groups at C13 of the macrocyclic ring, whereas the milbemycins are protonated at C13. Moxidectin (MOX), belonging to the milbemycin family, has other differences, including a methoxime at C23. The avermectins and MOX have broad-spectrum activity against nematodes and arthropods. They have similar but not identical, spectral ranges of activity and some avermectins and MOX have diverse formulations for great user flexibility. The longer half-life of MOX and its safety profile, allow MOX to be used in long-acting formulations. Some important differences between MOX and avermectins in interaction with various invertebrate ligand-gated ion channels are known and could be the basis of different efficacy and safety profiles. Modelling of IVM interaction with glutamate-gated ion channels suggest different interactions will occur with MOX. Similarly, profound differences between MOX and the avermectins are seen in interactions with ABC transporters in mammals and nematodes. These differences are important for pharmacokinetics, toxicity in animals with defective transporter expression, and probable mechanisms of resistance. Resistance to the avermectins has become widespread in parasites of some hosts and MOX resistance also exists and is increasing. There is some degree of cross-resistance between the avermectins and MOX, but avermectin resistance and MOX resistance are not identical. In many cases when resistance to avermectins is noticed, MOX produces a higher efficacy and quite often is fully effective at recommended dose rates. These similarities and differences should be appreciated for optimal decisions about parasite control, delaying, managing or reversing resistances, and also for appropriate anthelmintic combination.

Indexed as

ATP binding cassette transporterAvermectinIvermectinLigand-gated ion channelsMoxidectinNematodeToxicity

Identifiers

PMID24533275
PMCPMC3862425
OpenAlexW2015519080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.