Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24533260›Full record

ReviewInternational journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance2011

Is anthelmintic resistance a concern for the control of human soil-transmitted helminths?

Jozef Vercruysse, Marco Albonico, Jerzy M Behnke, Andrew C Kotze, Roger K Prichard, James S McCarthy, Antonio Montresor, Bruno Levecke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Anthelmintic drugs for treating ascariasis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jozef VercruysseGhent University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Laboratory of Parasitology, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Marco AlbonicoIvo de Carneri Foundation, Milan, Italy.
Jerzy M BehnkeSchool of Biology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Andrew C KotzeDivision of Livestock Industries, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Brisbane, Australia.
Roger K PrichardInstitute of Parasitology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
James S McCarthyQueensland Institute for Medical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.
Antonio MontresorDepartment of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Bruno LeveckeGhent University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Laboratory of Parasitology, Merelbeke, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The major human soil-transmitted helminths (STH), Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworms (Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale) and Trichuris trichiura have a marked impact on human health in many parts of the world. Current efforts to control these parasites rely predominantly on periodic mass administration of anthelmintic drugs to school age children and other at-risk groups. After many years of use of these same drugs for controlling roundworms in livestock, high levels of resistance have developed, threatening the sustainability of these livestock industries in some locations. Hence, the question arises as to whether this is likely to also occur in the human STH, thereby threatening our ability to control these parasites. This is particularly important because of the recent increase in mass control programmes, relying almost exclusively on benzimidazole anthelmintics. It will be important to ensure that resistance is detected as it emerges in order to allow the implementation of mitigation strategies, such as use of drug combinations, to ensure that the effectiveness of the few existing anthelmintic drugs is preserved. In this review we address these issues by firstly examining the efficacy of anthelmintics against the human STH, and assessing whether there are any indications to date that resistance has emerged. We then consider the factors that influence the effect of current drug-use patterns in selecting for resistant parasite populations. We describe the tools currently available for resistance monitoring (field-based coprological methods), and those under development (in vitro bioassays and molecular tests), and highlight confounding factors that need to be taken into account when interpreting such resistance-monitoring data. We then highlight means to ensure that the currently available tools are used correctly, particularly with regard to study design, and we set appropriate drug-efficacy thresholds. Finally, we make recommendations for monitoring drug efficacy in the field, as components of control programmes, in order to maximise the ability to detect drug resistance, and if it arises to change control strategy and prevent the spread of resistance.

Indexed as

Anthelmintic resistanceAnthelminticsGuidelinesSoil-transmitted helminths

Identifiers

PMID24533260
PMCPMC3913213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.