Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24533214›Full record

ArticleISRN obesity2012

Young People's Views on Accelerometer Use in Physical Activity Research: Findings from a User Involvement Investigation.

Joanna Kirby, Carly Tibbins, Claire Callens, Beckie Lang, Margaret Thorogood, William Tigbe, Wendy Robertson

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISRN obesity, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna KirbyDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Carly TibbinsMCRN User Involvement, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham B4 6NH, UK.
Claire CallensMCRN User Involvement, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham B4 6NH, UK.
Beckie LangDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Margaret ThorogoodDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
William TigbeDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Wendy RobertsonDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
University of Warwick · GBBirmingham Children's Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health 09/127/41
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of accelerometers to objectively measure physical activity is important in understanding young people's behaviours, as physical activity plays a key part in obesity prevention and treatment. A user-involvement qualitative study with young people aged 7-18 years (n = 35) was carried out to investigate views on accelerometer use to inform an obesity treatment research study. First impressions were often negative, with issues related to size and comfort reported. Unwanted attention from wearing an accelerometer and bullying risk were also noted. Other disadvantages included feeling embarrassed and not being able to wear the device for certain activities. Positive aspects included feeling "special" and having increased attention from friends. Views on the best time to wear accelerometers were mixed. Advice was offered on how to make accelerometers more appealing, including presenting them in a positive way, using a clip rather than elastic belt to attach, personalising the device, and having feedback on activity levels. Judgements over the way in which accelerometers are used should be made at the study development stage and based on the individual population. In particular, introducing accelerometers in a clear and positive way is important. Including a trial wearing period, considering practical issues, and providing incentives may help increase compliance.

Identifiers

PMID24533214
PMCPMC3914257
OpenAlexW2061971458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.