Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24532979›Full record

ArticleMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement2014

Diversity, genetic mapping, and signatures of domestication in the carrot (

Dariusz Grzebelus, Massimo Iorizzo, Douglas Senalik, Shelby Ellison, Pablo Cavagnaro, Alicja Macko-Podgorni, Kasia Heller-Uszynska, Andrzej Kilian, Thomas Nothnagel, Charlotte Allender and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advancing utilization of diverse global carrot (Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Dariusz GrzebelusInsitute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. 29 Listopada 54, 31-425 Krakow, Poland.
Massimo IorizzoDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
Douglas SenalikDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706 USA ; Vegetable Crops Research Unit, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, University of Wisconsin, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
Shelby EllisonDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
Pablo CavagnaroCONICET and INTA EEA La Consulta, CC8 La Consulta (5567), Mendoza, Argentina.
Alicja Macko-PodgorniInsitute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. 29 Listopada 54, 31-425 Krakow, Poland.
Kasia Heller-UszynskaDiversity Arrays Technology Pty Ltd, 1 Wilf Crane Crescent, Yarralumla, ACT 2600 Australia.
Andrzej KilianDiversity Arrays Technology Pty Ltd, 1 Wilf Crane Crescent, Yarralumla, ACT 2600 Australia.
Thomas NothnagelInstitute for Breeding Research on Horticultural and Fruit Crops, Julius Kühn-Institut, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Erwin-Baur-Str. 27, 06484 Quedlinburg, Germany.
Charlotte AllenderWarwick Crop Centre, University of Warwick, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF UK.
Philipp W SimonDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706 USA ; Vegetable Crops Research Unit, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, University of Wisconsin, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
Rafal BaranskiInsitute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. 29 Listopada 54, 31-425 Krakow, Poland.
University of Agriculture in Krakow · PLUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USAgricultural Research Service · USCentro Científico Tecnológico - Mendoza · ARJulius Kühn-Institut · DEUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carrot is one of the most economically important vegetables worldwide, but genetic and genomic resources supporting carrot breeding remain limited. We developed a Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) platform for wild and cultivated carrot and used it to investigate genetic diversity and to develop a saturated genetic linkage map of carrot. We analyzed a set of 900 DArT markers in a collection of plant materials comprising 94 cultivated and 65 wild carrot accessions. The accessions were attributed to three separate groups: wild, Eastern cultivated and Western cultivated. Twenty-seven markers showing signatures for selection were identified. They showed a directional shift in frequency from the wild to the cultivated, likely reflecting diversifying selection imposed in the course of domestication. A genetic linkage map constructed using 188 F2 plants comprised 431 markers with an average distance of 1.1 cM, divided into nine linkage groups. Using previously anchored single nucleotide polymorphisms, the linkage groups were physically attributed to the nine carrot chromosomes. A cluster of markers mapping to chromosome 8 showed significant segregation distortion. Two of the 27 DArT markers with signatures for selection were segregating in the mapping population and were localized on chromosomes 2 and 6. Chromosome 2 was previously shown to carry the

Indexed as

CarrotDArTDiversity structureDomesticationLinkage mappingSelection

Identifiers

PMID24532979
PMCPMC3918115
OpenAlexW2095283720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.