ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2012
Comparison of PET/CT with conventional imaging modalities (USG, CECT) in evaluation of N0 neck in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multicenter Trial of [Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019Trial
- Lymph node disease in 2-deoxy-2-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging: Advances in artificial intelligence-driven automatic segmentation and precise diagnosis.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Novel technique in intraoperative localisation of skin cancer metastasis using ultrasound guidance: a case report.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Comparing the Efficacy of CT, MRI, PET-CT, and US in the Detection of Cervical Lymph Node Metastases in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Clinically Negative Neck Lymph Node: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- FDG PET-CT for the Detection of Occult Nodal Metastases in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2024Review
- FDG-PET/CT and Pathology in Newly Diagnosed Head and Neck Cancer: ACRIN 6685 Trial, FDG-PET/CT cN0.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvaluation of a clinically N0 neck is mandatory in cases of squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck region in order to determine the need to address the neck. The study was designed to compare the accuracy of PET/CT scan with that of USG and CECT Neck in assessing clinically N0 neck in cases of squamous cell carcinoma of upper aerodigestive tract.
methodsSingle center, prospective, study over a 2 year period. All Cases of squamous cell carcinoma of upper aerodigestive tract with no palpable neck lymphadenopathy and who were scheduled for surgery were evaluated with USG, CECT and 18F-FDG PET/CT, of the neck. Post operative histopathology was correlated with pre-operative nodal status. Statistical analysis was done using the chi square test.
resultsIn the 49 patients enrolled, 51 neck sides underwent dissections. Sensitivity of USG, CECT and PET-CT was 4.76%, 23.80% and 71.43% respectively while the specificity was 93.33%, 93.33% and 96.67% respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) calculated for USG, CECT and PET-CT was 33.33%, 71%, 93.5% respectively while the negative predictive value (NPV) 58.33%, 63.63% and 82.85% respectively.
conclusionsIn N0 neck in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, though FDG-PET-CT is more accurate than either USG or CECT in staging of the neck, it is not accurate enough to alter the current treatment paradigm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.