Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24532836›Full record

ReviewLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2014

The less things change, the more they are different: contributions of long-term synaptic plasticity and homeostasis to memory.

Samuel Schacher, Jiang-Yuan Hu

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. On the Stability of BOLD fMRI Correlations.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Structural Components of Synaptic Plasticity and Memory Consolidation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Long-delayed expression of the immediate early gene Arc/Arg3.1 refines neuronal circuits to perpetuate fear memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel SchacherDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York 10032, USA.
Jiang-Yuan Hu
Columbia University · USNew York State Psychiatric Institute

Funding

MECHANISMS MEDIATING LONG-TERM SYNAPTIC PLASTICITYR01MH060387 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI SCHACHER, SAMUEL · 2001 to 2016
$4.3M
NIMH NIH HHS MH060387NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important cellular mechanism contributing to the strength and duration of memories is activity-dependent alterations in the strength of synaptic connections within the neural circuit encoding the memory. Reversal of the memory is typically correlated with a reversal of the cellular changes to levels expressed prior to the stimulation. Thus, for stimulus-induced changes in synapse strength and their reversals to be functionally relevant, cellular mechanisms must regulate and maintain synapse strength both prior to and after the stimuli inducing learning and memory. The strengths of synapses within a neural circuit at any given moment are determined by cellular and molecular processes initiated during development and those subsequently regulated by the history of direct activation of the neural circuit and system-wide stimuli such as stress or motivational state. The cumulative actions of stimuli and other factors on an already modified neural circuit are attenuated by homeostatic mechanisms that prevent changes in overall synaptic inputs and excitability above or below specific set points (synaptic scaling). The mechanisms mediating synaptic scaling prevent potential excitotoxic alterations in the circuit but also may attenuate additional cellular changes required for learning and memory, thereby apparently limiting information storage. What cellular and molecular processes control synaptic strengths before and after experience/activity and its reversals? In this review we will explore the synapse-, whole cell-, and circuit level-specific processes that contribute to an overall zero sum-like set of changes and long-term maintenance of synapse strengths as a consequence of the accommodative interactions between long-term synaptic plasticity and homeostasis.

Indexed as

HomeostasisHumansMemoryNeuronal PlasticitySynapses

Identifiers

PMID24532836
PMCPMC3929853
OpenAlexW2146532031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.