ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2014
Managing latent tuberculosis in UK renal transplant units: how does practice compare with published guidance?
Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal transplantation significantly increases the risk of active tuberculosis (TB) in individuals with latent TB infection (LTBI). UK transplant recipients are often born in TB endemic areas. Using a self-completed questionnaire, we evaluated how the 23 UK renal transplant units' LTBI management compared with recently published national guidance. Three-quarters had a management protocol, but only one-third of these were in line with the guidance. Interferon-gamma release assays were rarely used to confirm LTBI. Almost half of the units prescribed LTBI treatment at the wrong dose or duration. We conclude that units should develop local protocols in line with evidence-based guidance. This must be in a format that enables national audit programmes and quality improvement to be routinely performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.