Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24532175›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2014

Negative autopsy and sudden cardiac death.

Oscar Campuzano, Catarina Allegue, Sara Partemi, Anna Iglesias, Antonio Oliva, Ramon Brugada

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Genetic Determinants of Inherited Cardiac Arrhythmias.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Role of non-coding variants in cardiovascular disease.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Molecular autopsy in sudden cardiac death.Global cardiology science & practice · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Long QT Syndrome and Sinus Bradycardia-A Mini Review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Oscar CampuzanoCardiovascular Genetic Center, University of Girona-IDIBGI, Girona, Spain.
Catarina Allegue
Sara Partemi
Anna Iglesias
Antonio Oliva
Ramon Brugada
Catholic University of America · USInstitut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona · ESUniversity of Girona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic medicine defines the unexplained sudden death as a death with a non-conclusive diagnosis after autopsy. Molecular diagnosis is being progressively incorporated in forensics, mainly due to improvement in genetics. New genetic technologies may help to identify the genetic cause of death, despite clinical interpretation of genetic data remains the current challenge. The identification of an inheritable defect responsible for arrhythmogenic syndromes could help to adopt preventive measures in family members, many of them asymptomatic but at risk of sudden death. This multidisciplinary translational research requires a specialized team.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacAutopsyCardiomyopathiesChannelopathiesDeath, Sudden, CardiacDNAForensic GeneticsGenetic TestingHumansMedical History TakingRNA, MessengerSequence Analysis, DNADNARNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID24532175
OpenAlexW1983886037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.