Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24531843›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2014

Emergency CT head and neck imaging: effects of swimmer's position on dose and image quality.

Fabian G Mueck, Sebastian Roesch, Lucas Geyer, Michael Scherr, Michael Seidenbusch, Robert Stahl, Zsuzsanna Deak, Stefan Wirth

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fabian G MueckInstitut für Klinische Radiologie, LMU Klinikum der Universität München - Innenstadt, Department of Clinical Radiology, LMU Hospital of the University of Munich - Downtown Campus, Nußbaumstr. 20, 80336, Munich, Germany, fabian.mueck@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Sebastian Roesch
Lucas Geyer
Michael Scherr
Michael Seidenbusch
Robert Stahl
Zsuzsanna Deak
Stefan Wirth

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the effects of different arm positions on dose exposure and image quality (IQ) in cervical spine CT after trauma in different patient groups.

methodsPatients in standard (STD = 126) and in swimmer's position (SWIM = 254) were included. Body mass index (BMI subgroup 1 = underweight to subgroup 4 = obese), anterior-posterior diameter (AP), left-right diameter (LR), area of an ellipse (AoE) and angle between the humeral heads (optimal STD < 3°, optimal SWIM > 10°) were used as grouping criteria. Computed tomography dose index (CTDI) was documented. Two radiologists rated the IQ at three levels (CV1/2, CV4/5, CV7/T1) using a semi-quantitative scale (0 = not diagnostic, 1 = diagnostic with limitations, 2 = diagnostic without limitations). The Mann-Whitney U test correlations of grouping criteria with dose effects and intra-class correlation (ICC) were calculated.

resultsICC was 0.87. BMI grouping showed the strongest correlation with dose effects: CTDI of optimal STD versus optimal SWIM positioning was 3.17 mGy versus 2.46 mGy (subgroup 1), 5.47 mGy versus 3.97 mGy (subgroup 2), 7.35 mGy versus 5.96 mGy (subgroup 3) and 8.71 mGy versus 8.18 mGy (subgroup 4). Mean IQ at CV7/T1 was 1.65 versus 1.23 (subgroup 1), 1.27 versus 1.46 (subgroup 2), 1.06 versus 1.46 (subgroup 3), 0.79 versus 1.5 (subgroup 4).

conclusionPatients with a BMI > 20 kg/m(2) benefited from both potential dose reduction and improved image quality at the critical cervicothoracic junction when swimmer's position was used. KEY POINTS: • BMI is a useful metric for personalized optimization in CT for the c-spine. • Using swimmer's position, patients can benefit from dose reduction. • In some patients a superior image quality can be achieved with swimmer's position. • For swimmer's positioning an angle of more than 10° is optimal.

Indexed as

PostureAdultAgedCervical VertebraeDose-Response Relationship, RadiationEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHeadHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeckRadiation DosageSwimmingTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.