Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24531765›Full record

ArticleNature2014

Two independent transcription initiation codes overlap on vertebrate core promoters.

Vanja Haberle, Nan Li, Yavor Hadzhiev, Charles Plessy, Christopher Previti, Chirag Nepal, Jochen Gehrig, Xianjun Dong, Altuna Akalin, Ana Maria Suzuki and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 207 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The molecular basis of transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Core promoterome of barley embryo.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Vanja Haberle *Department of Biology, University of Bergen, Thormøhlensgate 53A, N-5008 Bergen, Norway.
Nan Li *School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Yavor HadzhievSchool of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Charles PlessyRIKEN Omics Science Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0045 Japan (ceased to exist on 01 April 2013 due to RIKEN reorganisation).
Christopher PrevitiComputational Biology Unit, Uni Computing, Uni Research AS, University of Bergen, Thormøhlensgate 55, N-5008 Bergen, Norway.
Chirag NepalComputational Biology Unit, Uni Computing, Uni Research AS, University of Bergen, Thormøhlensgate 55, N-5008 Bergen, Norway.
Jochen GehrigSchool of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Xianjun DongComputational Biology Unit, Uni Computing, Uni Research AS, University of Bergen, Thormøhlensgate 55, N-5008 Bergen, Norway.
Altuna AkalinComputational Biology Unit, Uni Computing, Uni Research AS, University of Bergen, Thormøhlensgate 55, N-5008 Bergen, Norway.
Ana Maria SuzukiRIKEN Omics Science Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0045 Japan (ceased to exist on 01 April 2013 due to RIKEN reorganisation).
Wilfred F J van IJckenErasmus Medical Center, Center for Biomics, Room Ee679b, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Olivier ArmantInstitute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Postfach 3640, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Marco FergInstitute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Postfach 3640, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Uwe SträhleInstitute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Postfach 3640, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Piero CarninciRIKEN Omics Science Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0045 Japan (ceased to exist on 01 April 2013 due to RIKEN reorganisation).
Ferenc MüllerSchool of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Boris LenhardInstitute of Clinical Sciences and MRC Clinical Sciences Center, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Friedrich Miescher Institute · CHKarlsruhe Institute of Technology · DEUniversity of Birmingham · GBErasmus MC · NLHammersmith Hospital · GBImperial College London · GBUni Research (Norway) · NO

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_1102/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A core promoter is a stretch of DNA surrounding the transcription start site (TSS) that integrates regulatory inputs and recruits general transcription factors to initiate transcription. The nature and causative relationship of the DNA sequence and chromatin signals that govern the selection of most TSSs by RNA polymerase II remain unresolved. Maternal to zygotic transition represents the most marked change of the transcriptome repertoire in the vertebrate life cycle. Early embryonic development in zebrafish is characterized by a series of transcriptionally silent cell cycles regulated by inherited maternal gene products: zygotic genome activation commences at the tenth cell cycle, marking the mid-blastula transition. This transition provides a unique opportunity to study the rules of TSS selection and the hierarchy of events linking transcription initiation with key chromatin modifications. We analysed TSS usage during zebrafish early embryonic development at high resolution using cap analysis of gene expression, and determined the positions of H3K4me3-marked promoter-associated nucleosomes. Here we show that the transition from the maternal to zygotic transcriptome is characterized by a switch between two fundamentally different modes of defining transcription initiation, which drive the dynamic change of TSS usage and promoter shape. A maternal-specific TSS selection, which requires an A/T-rich (W-box) motif, is replaced with a zygotic TSS selection grammar characterized by broader patterns of dinucleotide enrichments, precisely aligned with the first downstream (+1) nucleosome. The developmental dynamics of the H3K4me3-marked nucleosomes reveal their DNA-sequence-associated positioning at promoters before zygotic transcription and subsequent transcription-independent adjustment to the final position downstream of the zygotic TSS. The two TSS-defining grammars coexist, often physically overlapping, in core promoters of constitutively expressed genes to enable their expression in the two regulatory environments. The dissection of overlapping core promoter determinants represents a framework for future studies of promoter structure and function across different regulatory contexts.

Indexed as

Transcription Initiation SiteAnimalsBase SequenceEmbryo, NonmammalianFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHistonesMethylationMothersNucleosomesPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription Initiation, GeneticTranscriptomeZebrafishZygoteHistonesNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID24531765
PMCPMC4820030
OpenAlexW2077173342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.