ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2014
Accuracy of estimation of genomic breeding values in pigs using low-density genotypes and imputation.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Large-scale association study on daily weight gain in pigs reveals overlap of genetic factors for growth in humans.BMC genomics · 2022Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of genome-wide association from genomic prediction models.Animal genetics · 2016Pooled it
- Genomic breeding value prediction and accuracy assessment for carcass traits in Jeju Black Cattle using Hanwoo reference populations.Animal bioscience · 2026Article
- Random forest imputation and genomic prediction for missing egg production time-series data in yellow-feathered broiler breeders.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Genomic selection accuracy and bias using imputed genotypes on growth, welfare and fitness traits in two Pekin duck lines.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Combination of QTL mapping and GWAS for fine mapping and gene mining of drought tolerance and seed yield components in faba bean (Vicia faba L.).BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Genomic Selection for Early Growth Traits in Inner Mongolian Cashmere Goats Using ABLUP, GBLUP, and ssGBLUP Methods.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Flavor Precursor Traits in Chengkou Mountain Chicken.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Evaluation of accuracies of genomic predictions for body conformation traits in Korean Holstein.Animal bioscience · 2024Article
- Transgenerational epigenetic heritability for growth, body composition, and reproductive traits in Landrace pigs.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Genome-wide association study for yield-related traits in faba bean (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Genomic Predictions in Korean Hanwoo Cows: A Comparative Analysis of Genomic BLUP and Bayesian Methods for Reproductive Traits.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Whole-Genome Sequence Imputation Strategies in Korean Hanwoo Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Article
- Weighted Single-Step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction Method Application for Assessing Pigs on Meat Productivity and Reproduction Traits.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Estimation of direct and maternal genetic effects and annotation of potential candidate genes for weight and meat quality traits in a genotyped outdoor dual-purpose cattle breed.Translational animal science · 2022Article
- Genomic Prediction of Average Daily Gain, Back-Fat Thickness, and Loin Muscle Depth Using Different Genomic Tools in Canadian Swine Populations.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Genomic selection through single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction improves the accuracy of evaluation in Hanwoo cattle.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2020Article
- Development of a low-density panel for genomic selection of pigs in Russia.Translational animal science · 2020Article
- Evaluation of imputation accuracy using the combination of two high-density panels in Nelore beef cattle.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic selection has the potential to increase genetic progress. Genotype imputation of high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes can improve the cost efficiency of genomic breeding value (GEBV) prediction for pig breeding. Consequently, the objectives of this work were to: (1) estimate accuracy of genomic evaluation and GEBV for three traits in a Yorkshire population and (2) quantify the loss of accuracy of genomic evaluation and GEBV when genotypes were imputed under two scenarios: a high-cost, high-accuracy scenario in which only selection candidates were imputed from a low-density platform and a low-cost, low-accuracy scenario in which all animals were imputed using a small reference panel of haplotypes. Phenotypes and genotypes obtained with the PorcineSNP60 BeadChip were available for 983 Yorkshire boars. Genotypes of selection candidates were masked and imputed using tagSNP in the GeneSeek Genomic Profiler (10K). Imputation was performed with BEAGLE using 128 or 1800 haplotypes as reference panels. GEBV were obtained through an animal-centric ridge regression model using de-regressed breeding values as response variables. Accuracy of genomic evaluation was estimated as the correlation between estimated breeding values and GEBV in a 10-fold cross validation design. Accuracy of genomic evaluation using observed genotypes was high for all traits (0.65-0.68). Using genotypes imputed from a large reference panel (accuracy: R(2) = 0.95) for genomic evaluation did not significantly decrease accuracy, whereas a scenario with genotypes imputed from a small reference panel (R(2) = 0.88) did show a significant decrease in accuracy. Genomic evaluation based on imputed genotypes in selection candidates can be implemented at a fraction of the cost of a genomic evaluation using observed genotypes and still yield virtually the same accuracy. On the other side, using a very small reference panel of haplotypes to impute training animals and candidates for selection results in lower accuracy of genomic evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.