Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24531611›Full record

Trial reportCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2014

A multicenter phase II study of biweekly capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.

Yee Chao, Jan-Sing Hsieh, Hsien-Tang Yeh, Yu-Chieh Su, Cheng-Chung Wu, Jen-Shi Chen, Cheng-Jeng Tai, Li-Yuan Bai, Kun-Huei Yeh, Wu-Chou Su and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Oxaliplatin-induced Peripheral Neuropathy in South Indian Cancer Patients: A Prospective Study in Digestive Tract Cancer Patients.Indian journal of medical and paediatric oncology : official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric Oncology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yee ChaoDepartment of Oncology Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jan-Sing Hsieh
Hsien-Tang Yeh
Yu-Chieh Su
Cheng-Chung Wu
Jen-Shi Chen
Cheng-Jeng Tai
Li-Yuan Bai
Kun-Huei Yeh
Wu-Chou Su
Chung-Pin Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe evaluated the safety and efficacy of biweekly capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.

methodsPatients received oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-10 plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-h intravenous infusion on day 1, every 2 weeks (XELOX). The primary endpoint was overall response rate. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity.

resultsFrom March 2007 to October 2010, 46 patients were enrolled in this phase II study. The median age was 64 years (range 32-85). A total of 391 (median 7.5, range 1-29) cycles were delivered. Among the 41 patients evaluable for tumor response, 9 showed partial response and 25 had stable disease. The overall response rates of the evaluable and intent-to-treat (ITT) populations were 22 % (95 % CI 10-42 %) and 20 % (95 % CI 9-34 %), respectively. In the ITT analysis, the progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.6 months (95 % CI 4.1-6.3 months) and 8.0 months (95 % CI 6.3-10.1 months), respectively. The most common hematological toxicities were thrombocytopenia (35 %) and leucopenia (34 %), whereas the most common non-hematological toxicities were neuropathy (35 %), fatigue (33 %), diarrhea (27 %), vomiting (26 %), and hand-foot syndrome (25 %). Major grade 3-4 toxicities were anemia (11 %), diarrhea (9 %), and hand-foot syndrome (7 %). No patient died of treatment-related toxicities.

conclusionsAlthough the biweekly XELOX regimen failed its primary response rate endpoint, it showed modest efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleFluorouracilHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinStomach NeoplasmsCapecitabineDeoxycytidineFluorouracilOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID24531611
PMCPMC3965832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.