Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24531419›Full record

ArticleNature methods2014

Efficient multivariate linear mixed model algorithms for genome-wide association studies.

Xiang Zhou, Matthew Stephens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 484 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
484citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

484 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Integration ofFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Genome-wide meta-analysis of alcohol use disorder in East Asians.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

424 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiang Zhou1] Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. [2] Department of Statistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Matthew Stephens1] Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. [2] Department of Statistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

Genome analysis: statistical methods and applicationsR01HG002585 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MATTHEW STEPHENS · 2002 to 2026
$8.4M
Integrating genomics and gene expression analyses to map CVD-associated lociR01HL092206 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GILAD, YOAV · 2009 to 2021
$7.3M
Genome analysis: statistical methods and applicationsR56HG002585 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI STEPHENS, MATTHEW · 2023 to 2023
$292k
NHGRI NIH HHS HG02585NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002585NHGRI NIH HHS R56 HG002585NHLBI NIH HHS HL092206NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL092206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multivariate linear mixed models (mvLMMs) are powerful tools for testing associations between single-nucleotide polymorphisms and multiple correlated phenotypes while controlling for population stratification in genome-wide association studies. We present efficient algorithms in the genome-wide efficient mixed model association (GEMMA) software for fitting mvLMMs and computing likelihood ratio tests. These algorithms offer improved computation speed, power and P-value calibration over existing methods, and can deal with more than two phenotypes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenomeLinear ModelsMultivariate AnalysisLikelihood FunctionsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSoftware

Identifiers

PMID24531419
PMCPMC4211878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.