ReviewLife sciences2014
Using caffeine and other adenosine receptor antagonists and agonists as therapeutic tools against neurodegenerative diseases: a review.
Review in Life sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04001712 (Effect of Early Use of Caffeine Citrate in Preterm Neonates Needing Respiratory Support.), which is not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Early Use of Caffeine Citrate in Preterm Neonates Needing Respiratory Support.
Who cites it
82 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 201 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the genetic estimates of the association between plasma caffeine and cancer risk through Mendelian randomization.European journal of nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Analysis of genetically determined gene expression suggests role of inflammatory processes in exfoliation syndrome.BMC genomics · 2023Pooled it
- Caffeine and Exercise in Obesity-Associated Brain Aging and Neurodegeneration: Mechanistic Insights into AMPK/SIRT1/PGC-1α, BDNF/TrkB, and NLRP3 Inflammasome Signaling.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Purinergic modulation in Parkinson's disease: the dual role of istradefylline in motor and cognitive outcomes.Purinergic signalling · 2026Review
- Cocoa Bean Shell as a Functional Food By-Product: Antioxidant Potential and Toxicological Thresholds inFood science & nutrition · 2026Article
- The biphasic regulatory effect of adenosine A2B receptor in ischemic brain injury and its therapeutic potential.Purinergic signalling · 2026Review
- A New Insight into Acne Pathogenesis: Multi-Omics Links a Metabolite toClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Modulatory Effects of Caffeine on Imatinib Binding: A Molecular Docking Study Targeting CYP3A4.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Insights from Clinical Trials on AACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Review
- Review
- Alterations in the Processing of Platelet APP (Amyloid Beta Precursor Protein) in Alzheimer Disease: The Possible Nexus.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2025Review
- Modifiable risk factors associated with the risk of developing Parkinson's disease: a critical review.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Review
- DeepDrug as an expert guided and AI driven drug repurposing methodology for selecting the lead combination of drugs for Alzheimer's disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Discovering natural products as potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Ketogenic diet, adenosine, and dopamine in addiction and psychiatry.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Effect of Xanthohumol, a Bioactive Natural Compound from Hops, on Adenosine Pathway in Rat C6 Glioma and Human SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cell Lines.Nutrients · 2024Article
- The different effects of four adenosine receptors in liver fibrosis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Advances in Therapies to Treat Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Synergistic Effect ofNutrients · 2023Article
22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Caffeine is the most consumed pychostimulant in the world, and it is known to affect basic and fundamental human processes such as sleep, arousal, cognition and learning and memory. It works as a nonselective blocker of adenosine receptors (A1, A2a, A2b and A3) and has been related to the regulation of heart rate, the contraction/relaxation of cardiac and smooth muscles, and the neural signaling in the central nervous system (CNS). Since the late 1990s, studies using adenosine receptor antagonists, such as Caffeine, to block the A1 and A2a adenosine receptor subtypes have shown to reduce the physical, cellular and molecular damages caused by a spinal cord injury (SCI) or a stroke (cerebral infarction) and by other neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases. Interestingly, other studies using adenosine receptor agonists have also shown to provide a neuroprotective effect on various models of neurodegenerative diseases through the reduction of excitatory neurotransmitter release, apoptosis and inflammatory responses, among others. The seemingly paradoxical use of both adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists as neuroprotective agents has been attributed to differences in dosage levels, drug delivery method, extracellular concentration of excitatory neurotransmitters and stage of disease progression. We discuss and compare recent findings using both antagonists and agonists of adenosine receptors in animal models and patients that have suffered spinal cord injuries, brain strokes, and Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases. Additionally, we propose alternative interpretations on the seemingly paradoxical use of these drugs as potential pharmacological tools to treat these various types of neurodegenerative diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.