Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24529717›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2014

Rigosertib is a more effective radiosensitizer than cisplatin in concurrent chemoradiation treatment of cervical carcinoma, in vitro and in vivo.

Lorenzo Agoni, Indranil Basu, Seema Gupta, Alan Alfieri, Angela Gambino, Gary L Goldberg, E Premkumar Reddy, Chandan Guha

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anticancer Activity ofBiomolecules · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Another Brick to Confirm the Efficacy of Rigosertib as Anticancer Agent.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mechanisms for Tuning Engineered Nanomaterials to Enhance Radiation Therapy of Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lorenzo AgoniDepartment of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Indranil BasuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Seema GuptaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Biophysics Research Institute of America, North Miami Beach, Florida.
Alan AlfieriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Angela GambinoDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Gary L GoldbergDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
E Premkumar ReddyDepartment of Oncological Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Chandan GuhaDepartment of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. Electronic address: cguha@montefiore.org.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

Stem Cell-Based Therapies for Radiation-Induced Gastrointestinal Sydrome (RIGS)U19AI091175 · NIAID · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI GUHA, CHANDAN · 2010 to 2014
$13.1M
HIFU-enhanced tumor vaccinesR01EB009040 · NIBIB · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GUHA, CHANDAN · 2008 to 2012
$2.2M
Preparative irradiation for hepatocyte transplantationR01DK064670 · NIDDK · ALBERT EINSTEIN COL OF MED YESHIVA UNIV · PI GUHA, CHANDAN · 2005 to 2009
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI091175NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009040NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK064670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare rigosertib versus cisplatin as an effective radiosensitizing agent for cervical malignancies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Rigosertib and cisplatin were tested in cervical cancer cell lines, HeLa and C33A. A 24-hour incubation with rigosertib and cisplatin, before irradiation (2-8 Gy), was used for clonogenic survival assays. Cell cycle analysis (propidium iodide staining) and DNA damage (γ-H2AX expression) were evaluated by fluorescence-activated cell sorter cytometry. Rigosertib was also tested in vivo in tumor growth experiments on cervical cancer xenografts.

resultsRigosertib was demonstrated to induce a G2/M block in cancer cells. Survival curve comparison revealed a dose modification factor, as index of radiosensitization effect, of 1.1-1.3 for cisplatin and 1.4-2.2 for rigosertib. With 6-Gy irradiation, an increase in DNA damage of 15%-25% was achieved in both HeLa and C33A cells with cisplatin pretreatment, and a 71-108% increase with rigosertib pretreatment. In vivo tumor growth studies demonstrated higher performance of rigosertib when compared with cisplatin, with 53% longer tumor growth delay.

conclusionsRigosertib was more effective than cisplatin when combined with radiation and caused minimal toxicity. These data support the need for clinical trials with rigosertib in combination therapy for patients with cervical carcinoma.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCell Line, TumorCell SeparationCell SurvivalChemoradiotherapyCisplatinDNA DamageDNA RepairDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleFlow CytometryGlycineHeLa CellsHumansInhibitory Concentration 50CisplatinGlycineON 01910Radiation-Sensitizing AgentsSulfones

Identifiers

PMID24529717
PMCPMC4005001
OpenAlexW2042340428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.