Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24529253›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2014

Linked in: formation and regulation of microtubule attachments during chromosome segregation.

Dhanya K Cheerambathur, Arshad Desai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mitotic Cell Division inGenetics · 2019
    Review
  8. Multitasking Ska in Chromosome Segregation: Its Distinct Pools Might Specify Various Functions.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2018
    Review
  9. Kinase and Phosphatase Cross-Talk at the Kinetochore.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Journal of cell biology · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dhanya K CheerambathurLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. Electronic address: dcheerambathur@ucsd.edu.
Arshad DesaiLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. Electronic address: abdesai@ucsd.edu.

Funding

Kinetochore Specification and FunctionR01GM074215 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DESAI, ARSHAD · 2005 to 2025
$8.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM074215NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate segregation of the replicated genome during cell division depends on dynamic attachments formed between chromosomes and the microtubule polymers of the spindle. Here we review recent advances in mechanistic analysis of microtubule attachment formation and regulation.

Indexed as

Chromosome SegregationKinetochoresAnimalsHumansMicrotubulesNuclear ProteinsProtein BindingNuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24529253
PMCPMC3940152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.