Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24529248›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2014

Large-scale chromatin organization: the good, the surprising, and the still perplexing.

Andrew S Belmont

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Technologies to Study Genetics and Molecular Pathways.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Nuclear Architecture in the Nervous System.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The macro and micro of chromosome conformation capture.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Redefining the IBDs using genome-scale molecular phenotyping.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrew S BelmontDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, B107 CLSL, 601 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, United States. Electronic address: asbel@illinois.edu.

Funding

CHROMATIN DOMAIN STRUCTURE/FUNCTIONR01GM058460 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BELMONT, ANDREW STEVEN · 1999 to 2025
$8.0M
Engineering stable, independent multi-transgene expression in mammalian cellsR01GM098319 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BELMONT, ANDREW STEVEN · 2011 to 2014
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058460NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098319NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM58460NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM98319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally large-scale chromatin structure has been studied by microscopic approaches, providing direct spatial information but limited sequence context. In contrast, newer 3C (chromosome capture conformation) methods provide rich sequence context but uncertain spatial context. Recent demonstration of large, topologically linked DNA domains, hundreds to thousands of kb in size, may now link 3C data to actual chromosome physical structures, as visualized directly by microscopic methods. Yet, new data suggesting that 3C may measure cytological rather than molecular proximity prompts a renewed focus on understanding the origin of 3C interactions and dissecting the biological significance of long-range genomic interactions.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatinCytoplasmDNAGenomicsHumansMolecular ConformationChromatinDNA

Identifiers

PMID24529248
PMCPMC3927141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.