Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24529243›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2014

Synaptic vesicle morphology: a case of protein sorting?

Kumud R Poudel, Jihong Bai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kumud R PoudelDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jihong BaiDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: jbai@fhcrc.org.

Funding

Membrane Bending Machinery for Synaptic Vesicle EndocytosisR01NS085214 · NINDS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BAI, JIHONG · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
Mechanisms of Synapse RemodelingR00MH085039 · NIMH · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BAI, JIHONG · 2011 to 2013
$727k
NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH085039NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic vesicles (SVs) are the repositories of neurotransmitters. They are locally recycled at nerve terminals following exocytosis. A unique feature of these vesicles is the uniformity of their morphology, which is well maintained even after rounds of exocytosis and endocytosis. Several studies suggest that disruption of clathrin adaptor proteins leads to defects in sorting cargoes and alterations in SV morphology. Here, we review the links between adaptor proteins and SV size, and highlight how protein sorting may impact SV architecture. Molecular players such as clathrin, adaptor proteins, accessory proteins, SV cargoes and lipid composition may act together to establish a stable regulatory network to maintain SV morphology.

Indexed as

AnimalsEndocytosisProtein BindingProteinsProtein TransportSynaptic VesiclesProteins

Identifiers

PMID24529243
PMCPMC4079907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.