Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24528994›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2014

A genome-wide study of de novo deletions identifies a candidate locus for non-syndromic isolated cleft lip/palate risk.

Samuel G Younkin, Robert B Scharpf, Holger Schwender, Margaret M Parker, Alan F Scott, Mary L Marazita, Terri H Beaty, Ingo Ruczinski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Identification ofGenetics · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The recurrence risk of genetic complex diseases.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2017
    Review
  10. Genetics and genomics etiology of nonsyndromic orofacial clefts.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samuel G YounkinDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore MD, USA. syounkin@jhsph.edu.
Robert B Scharpf
Holger Schwender
Margaret M Parker
Alan F Scott
Mary L Marazita
Terri H Beaty
Ingo Ruczinski

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR001079 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2013 to 2017
$60.1M
Extending the Phenotype of Nonsyndromic Orofacial CleftsR01DE016148 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MARAZITA, MARY L., WEINBERG, SETH M · 2004 to 2018
$19.7M
International Genetic Epidemiology of Oral CleftsR01DE014581 · NIDCR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BEATY, TERRI H · 2004 to 2013
$6.6M
International Consortium to Identify Genes and Interactions Controlling Oral ClefU01DE018993 · NIDCR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BEATY, TERRI H · 2007 to 2008
$1.6M
Dental Caries: Whole Genome Association and Gene x Environment StudiesU01DE018903 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MARAZITA, MARY L. · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
Oral Clefts: Moving from Genome Wide Studies Toward Functional GenomicsU01DE020073 · NIDCR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BEATY, TERRI H · 2009 to 2013
$1.1M
Methods development and secondary analyses for an oral clefts association studyR03DE021437 · NIDCR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RUCZINSKI, INGO · 2011 to 2012
$477k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001079NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE014581NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE016148NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE021437NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE018903NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE018993NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE020073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCopy number variants (CNVs) may play an important part in the development of common birth defects such as oral clefts, and individual patients with multiple birth defects (including clefts) have been shown to carry small and large chromosomal deletions. In this paper we investigate de novo deletions defined as DNA segments missing in an oral cleft proband but present in both unaffected parents. We compare de novo deletion frequencies in children of European ancestry with an isolated, non-syndromic oral cleft to frequencies in children of European ancestry from randomly sampled trios.

resultsWe identified a genome-wide significant 62 kilo base (kb) non-coding region on chromosome 7p14.1 where de novo deletions occur more frequently among oral cleft cases than controls. We also observed wider de novo deletions among cleft lip and palate (CLP) cases than seen among cleft palate (CP) and cleft lip (CL) cases.

conclusionsThis study presents a region where de novo deletions appear to be involved in the etiology of oral clefts, although the underlying biological mechanisms are still unknown. Larger de novo deletions are more likely to interfere with normal craniofacial development and may result in more severe clefts. Study protocol and sample DNA source can severely affect estimates of de novo deletion frequencies. Follow-up studies are needed to further validate these findings and to potentially identify additional structural variants underlying oral clefts.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionDNA Copy Number VariationsAlgorithmsAllelesChildCleft LipCleft PalateGene FrequencyGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansWhite People

Identifiers

PMID24528994
PMCPMC3929298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.