Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24528898›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2014

Community engagement strategies in the original and renewal applications for CTSA grant funding.

Jessica Holzer, Nancy Kass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Engaging Communities and Empowering Research: Lessons from a Network of Community Engagement Cores.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Community engagement during COVID: A field report from seven CTSAs.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jessica HolzerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Nancy Kass

Funding

Yale Training Program in Health Services ResearchT32HS017589 · AHRQ · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHLESINGER, MARK J · 2008 to 2024
$5.6M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS017589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program has highlighted community engagement in research by requiring institutions to develop bidirectional relationships with communities to obtain funding. Little is known about how institutions have operationalized that requirement. This study aimed to describe the strategies proposed by the first institutions to receive CTSA funding and to undergo the CTSA renewal process.

methodsThe authors conducted a qualitative document analysis of the community engagement section of 12 original and 10 renewal grant applications of the 12 institutions awarded CTSA funding in 2006 and renewed in 2010.

resultsInstitutions employed - and research engagement strategies. Capacity-building strategies included education, pilot grants, connecting potential partners, and community research centers. Research engagement strategies ranged from those that allowed for very little input from communities, such as announcements, to those that allowed for a high amount of input from communities, such as community-researcher teams.

conclusionCTSA funding has supported capacity-building for institutions and communities to partner. Engagement strategies employed by the institutions are largely known from prior community-engaged research. Based on the grants from these institutions, the CTSA funding has largely enabled institutions to develop capacity to engage.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationTraining SupportBiomedical ResearchHumansNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Translational Research, BiomedicalUnited Statescommunity engagementqualitative methodstranslational research

Identifiers

PMID24528898
PMCPMC5414461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.