On the persistence of low power in psychological science.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A Systematic Review on the Evolution of Power Analysis Practices in Psychological Research.Psychologica Belgica · 2025
   Article
2. Estimating statistical power for structural equation models in developmental cognitive science: A tutorial in R : Power simulation for SEMs.Behavior research methods · 2024
   Article
3. Risk of bias in exercise science: A systematic review of 340 studies.iScience · 2024
   Article
4. A tutorial on using the paired t test for power calculations in repeated measures ANOVA with interactions.Behavior research methods · 2023
   Article
5. Improving the stability of bivariate correlations using informative Bayesian priors: a Monte Carlo simulation study.Frontiers in psychology · 2023
   Article
6. The hazards of dealing with response time outliers.Frontiers in psychology · 2023
   Article
7. When numbers fail: do researchers agree on operationalization of published research?Royal Society open science · 2021
   Article
8. Effect size, sample size and power of forced swim test assays in mice: Guidelines for investigators to optimize reproducibility.PloS one · 2021
   Article
9. Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature.Journal of cognition · 2019
   Article
10. How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables.Journal of cognition · 2019
    Article
11. Crisis or self-correction: Rethinking media narratives about the well-being of science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
12. Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial.Journal of cognition · 2018
    Article
13. Manipulating the Alpha Level Cannot Cure Significance Testing.Frontiers in psychology · 2018
    Review
14. Low statistical power in biomedical science: a review of three human research domains.Royal Society open science · 2017
    Article
15. A manifesto for reproducible science.Nature human behaviour · 2017
    Article
16. The earth is flat (PeerJ · 2017
    Article
17. The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors' reporting of statistics and use of open research practices.PloS one · 2017
    Article
18. Preventing the ends from justifying the means: withholding results to address publication bias in peer-review.BMC psychology · 2016
    Article
19. The natural selection of bad science.Royal Society open science · 2016
    Article
20. Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as