Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24527879›Full record

ArticlePhotomedicine and laser surgery2014

Multiresistant strains are as susceptible to photodynamic inactivation as their naïve counterparts: protoporphyrin IX-mediated photoinactivation reveals differences between methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Mariusz Grinholc, Aleksandra Rapacka-Zdonczyk, Bartosz Rybak, Florian Szabados, Krzysztof P Bielawski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Photomedicine and laser surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Photoinactivation of Multidrug-ResistantACS applied bio materials · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Photodynamic Inactivation of Methicillin-ResistantMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effective Photodynamic Inactivation of 26Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Can microbial cells develop resistance to oxidative stress in antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation?Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Avicenna journal of medical biotechnology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mariusz Grinholc1 Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics, Department of Biotechnology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk , Gdansk, Poland .
Aleksandra Rapacka-Zdonczyk
Bartosz Rybak
Florian Szabados
Krzysztof P Bielawski
Gdańsk Medical University · PLInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DEMedical & Biological Laboratories (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe current study was aimed at the investigation of differences in response to photoinactivation between methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) isolates. Moreover, we aimed to elucidate if the observed variation resulted from antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and strains' susceptibility to antibiotic therapy. BACKGROUND DATA: Because of the emergence of multidrug resistance, the development of alternative antimicrobial strategies seems to be required. The concept of photodynamic inactivation (PDI) involves cell exposure to appropriate wavelength light that leads to the excitation of photosensitizer molecules, resulting in the production of reactive oxygen species responsible for cell inactivation and death. Recently, we have demonstrated a strain-dependent response of S. aureus to photoinactivation, and observed elevated resistance to PDI among MRSA strains. Nevertheless, the mechanism underlying this phenomenon remains unexplained.

methodsS. aureus response to protoporphyrin IX (PPIX)-mediated photoinactivation was studied for 424 MRSA/MSSA isolates. VITEK 2 Advanced Expert System was used to detect antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and strains' susceptibility to antibiotictherapy.

resultsData obtained demonstrated that MRSA are significantly more resistant to photoinactivation than MSSA strains; however, the difference observed did not result from antimicrobial susceptibility or resistance mechanisms. Furthermore, regardless of the strains' origin, a similar effectiveness of PDI could be achieved. Moreover, it was determined that the ability to form biofilms in vitro, and the presence of mec element, does not explain the observed differences between MRSA and MSSA strains.

conclusionsPDI could be highly effective against multidrug resistant pathogens as well as their naïve counterparts. Nevertheless, regardless of the antimicrobial resistance mechanism, the difference in response to PDI between MRSA and MSSA exists.

Indexed as

Luminescent ProteinsMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPhotosensitizing AgentsProtoporphyrinsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationStaphylococcus aureusLuminescent ProteinsPhotosensitizing Agentsprotoporphyrin IXProtoporphyrins

Identifiers

PMID24527879
PMCPMC3952657
OpenAlexW2335448545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.