Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24527462›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Reliability and validity of the migraine disability assessment scale among migraine and tension type headache in Iranian patients.

Alireza Zandifar, Fatemeh Asgari, Faraidoon Haghdoost, Samaneh Sadat Masjedi, Navid Manouchehri, Mahboobeh Banihashemi, Abbas Ghorbani, Mohammad Reza Najafi, Mohammad Saadatnia, Richard B Lipton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Identifying Chinese Medicine Patterns of Tension-Type Headache and Understanding Its Subgroups.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alireza ZandifarPhysiology Research Center, Department of Physiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran ; Medical Student Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9480-949X
Fatemeh AsgariMedical Student Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Faraidoon HaghdoostMedical Student Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Samaneh Sadat MasjediMedical Student Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Navid ManouchehriMedical Student Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mahboobeh BanihashemiMedical Student Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Abbas GhorbaniDepartment of Neurology and Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammad Reza NajafiDepartment of Neurology and Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammad SaadatniaPhysiology Research Center, Department of Physiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran ; Department of Neurology and Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Richard B LiptonAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA ; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMIDAS is a valid and reliable short questionnaire for assessment of headache related disability. Linguistic validation of Persian MIDAS and assessment of psychometric properties between tension type headache (TTH) and migraine were the aims of this study.

methodsPatients with migraine or TTH were included. At the first visit, we administered a headache symptom questionnaire, MIDAS, and SF-36. Patients filled out MIDAS in second and third visit within three and eight weeks after base line visit. Internal consistency (Cronbach α ) and test-retest reproducibility (Spearman correlation coefficient) were used to assess reliability. Convergent validity and MIDAS capability to differentiate between chronic and episodic headaches (migraine and TTH) were also assessed.

resultsThe 267 participants had episodic migraine (EM-64%), chronic migraine (CM-13.5%), episodic TTH (ETTH-13.5%), and chronic TTH (CTTH-9). Internal consistency reliability was 0.8 for the entire sample, 0.72 for TTH, and 0.82 for migraine. Test-retest reliability for all questions between visit 1 and visit 2 varied from 0.54 to 0.71. Convergent validity was assessed using SF-36 as an external referent. Patients with episodic headaches (EM and ETTH) had significantly lower MIDAS scores than chronic headaches (CM and CTTH).

conclusionPersian MIDAS is a valid and reliable questionnaire for migraine and TTH that can differentiate between episodic headache and chronic headache.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansIranMaleMigraine DisordersPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTension-Type HeadacheYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24527462
PMCPMC3914354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.