Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24527354›Full record

ReviewAdvances in wound care2013

Neutrophils and Wound Repair: Positive Actions and Negative Reactions.

Traci A Wilgus, Sashwati Roy, Jodi C McDaniel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in wound care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 302 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
302citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

302 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 583 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Cytokines and Venous Leg Ulcer Healing-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

242 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Traci A WilgusDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University , Columbus, Ohio.
Sashwati RoyDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University , Columbus, Ohio.
Jodi C McDanielCollege of Nursing, The Ohio State University , Columbus, Ohio.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Mechanisms underlying impaired diabetic wound healingR01DK076566 · NIDDK · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROY, SASHWATI · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK076566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceNeutrophils are one of the most abundant cells of the immune system and they are extremely active during the repair of cutaneous wounds. In general, the antimicrobial activity of neutrophils is effective and allows these cells to carry out their primary function of preventing wounds from becoming infected. RECENT ADVANCES: It is now known that in addition to sterilizing the wound, the weapons used by neutrophils to kill potential pathogens can also cause significant tissue damage to the host. This additional damage can lead to delayed healing and excessive scar formation. CRITICAL ISSUES: Much of the host damage caused by neutrophils results from the activity of proteases secreted by these cells. The clinical significance of this problem is highlighted by numerous studies showing that high levels of neutrophil-derived proteases are associated with chronic, non-healing wounds. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Studies are currently being performed to evaluate new ways of counteracting protease activity in chronic wounds. Additional studies will have to be carried out to determine whether neutralizing neutrophil proteases can improve the healing of chronic wounds without sacrificing the ability of neutrophils to eliminate pathogens and risking infection.

Identifiers

PMID24527354
PMCPMC3763227
OpenAlexW2045982747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.