Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24527340›Full record

ReviewAdvances in wound care2013

Strategies Demonstrating Efficacy in Reducing Wound Contraction

Justin R Sharpe, Yella Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in wound care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Bioactive materials · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Effects of Curcumin on Vessel Formation Insight into the Pro- and Antiangiogenesis of Curcumin.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019
    Review
  10. The Utility of Silk-elastin Hydrogel as a New Material for Wound Healing.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2018
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Justin R SharpeBlond McIndoe Research Foundation, Queen Victoria Hospital , East Grinstead, United Kingdom .
Yella MartinBlond McIndoe Research Foundation, Queen Victoria Hospital , East Grinstead, United Kingdom .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceScarring continues to present a significant clinical problem. Wound contraction leads to scarring and is mediated by myofibroblasts and contractile forces across the wound bed. Contracture formation can have a significant impact on the quality of life of the patient, particularly where function and appearance are affected. RECENT ADVANCES: Novel tissue-engineered matrices, cell-based therapies, and medicinal therapeutics have shown significant reduction in wound contraction in CRITICAL ISSUES: There are no animal models that replicate all aspects of wound healing as seen in patients. Therefore, information obtained from FUTURE DIRECTIONS: The use of knockout mouse models in particular has generated significant advances in knowledge of the mechanisms behind myofibroblast conversion and other factors involved in generating tension across the wound. Medicinal therapeutics and tissue-engineering approaches that seek to disrupt/alter these pathways hold much promise for future development and translation to clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID24527340
PMCPMC3840550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.