Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24527306›Full record

ReviewAdvances in wound care2012

Update on Keloid Management: Clinical and Basic Science Advances.

Martha H Viera, Alejandra C Vivas, Brian Berman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in wound care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02521402 (Pilot Study to Evaluate Clinical Outcomes With the Use of Biovance, a Dehydrated Decellularized Human Amnion Membrane Allograft, Following Keloid Revision Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02521402 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study to Evaluate Clinical Outcomes With the Use of Biovance, a Dehydrated Decellularized Human Amnion Membrane Allograft, Following Keloid Revision Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorGolla Center for Plastic SurgeryRan2015 to 2017Enrolled10ConditionsKeloid ScarArmsBiovance
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pharmacotherapy for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Keloids: a review of therapeutic management.International journal of dermatology · 2021
    Review
  7. Emerging and Novel Therapies for Keloids: A compendious review.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Biological approaches for hypertrophic scars.International wound journal · 2020
    Review
  10. Squamous cell carcinoma arising in a keloid scar.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2019
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martha H VieraDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine , Miami, Florida.
Alejandra C VivasDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine , Miami, Florida.
Brian BermanDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine , Miami, Florida.
University of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKeloids are benign, fibroproliferative lesions that represent abnormal healing resulting in excessive fibrosis. They are composed of mainly type III (early) or type I (late) collagen. Some of the symptoms include pruritus, tenderness, and pain. Often, they are very difficult to treat and prevent from recurrence. In contrast to hypertrophic scars, keloids extend beyond the margin of the wound. THE PROBLEM: There is very limited evidence on the best wound management for minimizing scarring. Multiple available therapeutic modalities have been used for the treatment of keloids; however, high-recurrence rates continue to be reported. Unsuccessful treatment of keloids leads to psychological impact on the patients and increased economic burden. BASIC/CLINICAL SCIENCE ADVANCES: Currently, there are biological and antineoplastic agents that can potentially treat and prevent excessive scar formation. Some of them have been used as "off label" therapies, and others are still in the experimental phase such as interferon alpha (IFN-α), imiquimod, and transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-β1). The use of IFN-α2b showed 18% recurrence rate when applied to postsurgical excised keloids. Imiquimod 5% can lower recurrence rate on postshaved keloids to 37.5% at 6-month and to 0% at a 12-month follow-up period. TGF-β1 oligonucleotides have shown effective and long-lasting inhibition of TGF-β-mediated scarring

conclusionLatest discoveries in the use of novel agents suggest therapeutic alternatives for the prevention of recurrences of hypertrophic scars and postexcision keloid lesions.

Identifiers

PMID24527306
PMCPMC3839006
OpenAlexW2068026415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.