Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24527290›Full record

ReviewAdvances in wound care2012

Wound Healing Finally Enters the Age of Molecular Diagnostic Medicine.

Owatha L Tatum, Scot E Dowd

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in wound care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Do Mixed-Species Biofilms Dominate in Chronic Infections?-Need forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Owatha L TatumDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Walnut Creek, California.
Scot E DowdDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Walnut Creek, California.
Joint Genome Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany wounds are difficult to heal because of the large, complex community of microbes present within the wound. THE PROBLEM: Classical laboratory culture methods do not provide an accurate picture of the microbial interactions or representation of microorganisms within a wound. There is an inherent bias in diagnosis based upon classical culture stemming from the ability of certain organisms to thrive in culture while others are underrepresented or fail to be identified in culture altogether. Chronic wounds also contain polymicrobial infections existing as a cooperative community that is resistant to antibiotic therapy. BASIC/CLINICAL SCIENCE ADVANCES: New methods in molecular diagnostic medicine allow the identification of nearly all organisms present in a wound irrespective of the ability of these organisms to be grown in culture. Advances in DNA analyses allow absolute identification of microorganisms from very small clinical specimens. These new methods also provide a quantitative representation of all microorganisms contributing to these polymicrobial infections. CLINICAL CARE RELEVANCE: Technological advances in laboratory diagnostics can significantly shorten the time required to heal chronic wounds. Identification of the genetic signatures of organisms present within a wound allows clinicians to identify and treat the primary organisms responsible for nonhealing wounds.

conclusionAdvanced genetic technologies targeting the specific needs of wound care patients are now accessible to all wound care clinicians.

Identifiers

PMID24527290
PMCPMC3839019
OpenAlexW2097085175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.