Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24526836›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics and biology insights2014

Longitudinal analysis of whole blood transcriptomes to explore molecular signatures associated with acute renal allograft rejection.

Heesun Shin, Oliver Günther, Zsuzsanna Hollander, Janet E Wilson-McManus, Raymond T Ng, Robert Balshaw, Paul A Keown, Robert McMaster, Bruce M McManus, Nicole M Isbel and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03575910 (HEARTBiT), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03575910 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

HEARTBiT: A Novel Multi-Marker Blood Test for Management of Acute Cardiac Allograft Rejection

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2018 to 2026Enrolled196ConditionsHeart Transplant Failure and Rejection, Heart Failure, Heart Diseases, Heart Failure,Congestive
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Heesun ShinNCE CECR PROOF Centre of Excellence, Vancouver, BC. ; University of British Columbia (UBC) Department of Medicine, Vancouver, BC. ; Institute for HEART + LUNG Health, Vancouver, BC.
Oliver GüntherNCE CECR PROOF Centre of Excellence, Vancouver, BC.
Zsuzsanna HollanderNCE CECR PROOF Centre of Excellence, Vancouver, BC. ; UBC Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver, BC. ; Institute for HEART + LUNG Health, Vancouver, BC.
Janet E Wilson-McManusNCE CECR PROOF Centre of Excellence, Vancouver, BC.
Raymond T NgNCE CECR PROOF Centre of Excellence, Vancouver, BC. ; UBC Department of Computer Science, Vancouver, BC.
Robert BalshawNCE CECR PROOF Centre of Excellence, Vancouver, BC. ; UBC Department of Statistics, Vancouver, BC.
Paul A KeownNCE CECR PROOF Centre of Excellence, Vancouver, BC. ; University of British Columbia (UBC) Department of Medicine, Vancouver, BC.
Robert McMasterNCE CECR PROOF Centre of Excellence, Vancouver, BC. ; UBC Department of Medical Genetics, Vancouver, BC.
Bruce M McManusNCE CECR PROOF Centre of Excellence, Vancouver, BC. ; UBC Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver, BC. ; Institute for HEART + LUNG Health, Vancouver, BC.
Nicole M IsbelDepartment of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, and University of Queensland, Brisbane Australia.
Greg KnollThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Scott J TebbuttNCE CECR PROOF Centre of Excellence, Vancouver, BC. ; University of British Columbia (UBC) Department of Medicine, Vancouver, BC. ; Institute for HEART + LUNG Health, Vancouver, BC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we explored a time course of peripheral whole blood transcriptomes from kidney transplantation patients who either experienced an acute rejection episode or did not in order to better delineate the immunological and biological processes measureable in blood leukocytes that are associated with acute renal allograft rejection. Using microarrays, we generated gene expression data from 24 acute rejectors and 24 nonrejectors. We filtered the data to obtain the most unambiguous and robustly expressing probe sets and selected a subset of patients with the clearest phenotype. We then performed a data-driven exploratory analysis using data reduction and differential gene expression analysis tools in order to reveal gene expression signatures associated with acute allograft rejection. Using a template-matching algorithm, we then expanded our analysis to include time course data, identifying genes whose expression is modulated leading up to acute rejection. We have identified molecular phenotypes associated with acute renal allograft rejection, including a significantly upregulated signature of neutrophil activation and accumulation following transplant surgery that is common to both acute rejectors and nonrejectors. Our analysis shows that this expression signature appears to stabilize over time in nonrejectors but persists in patients who go on to reject the transplanted organ. In addition, we describe an expression signature characteristic of lymphocyte activity and proliferation. This lymphocyte signature is significantly downregulated in both acute rejectors and nonrejectors following surgery; however, patients who go on to reject the organ show a persistent downregulation of this signature relative to the neutrophil signature.

Indexed as

blood transcriptomicskidney transplant rejectionmicroarrayneutrophil to lymphocyte ratioperipheral whole blood

Identifiers

PMID24526836
PMCPMC3921155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.