ReviewForensic science, medicine, and pathology2014
The syndrome of excited delirium.
Review in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fatal neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a forensic case series on postmortem diagnostic challenges.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- In pursuit of inter-specialty consensus on excited delirium syndrome: a scoping literature review.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2023Article
- ACMT Position Statement: End the Use of the Term "Excited Delirium".Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2023Article
- A retrospective cohort study of pre-hospital agitation management by advanced paramedic practitioners in critical care.British paramedic journal · 2022Article
- Deaths Associated With Community Donation Bins: A Ten-Year Retrospective Review Describing Five Cases in British Columbia and Ontario.Academic forensic pathology · 2020Article
- Electrical weapons and excited delirium: shocks, stress, and serum serotonin.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2018Article
- Manner of Death Certification After Significant Emotional Stress: An Inter-Rater Variability Study and Review of the Literature.Academic forensic pathology · 2018Article
- Ongoing issues with the diagnosis of excited delirium.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2018Article
- Altered mental status and end organ damage associated with the use of gacyclidine: a case series.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The excited delirium syndrome (EDS) is a life-threatening condition caused by a variety of factors including drug intoxication and psychiatric illness. Fatal instances of excited delirium frequently come to the attention of the medical examiner/coroner due to the circumstances and potential causes. Excited delirium may include paranoid, aggressive, and incoherent behavior which may lead to an encounter with law enforcement. In some instances, the person may die while in the presence of law enforcement. This circumstance further broadens the potential causes of death particularly as EDS has no pathognomonic autopsy finding. Although the syndrome of excited delirium is sufficient to explain death, other intervening causes need to be considered. These include chest or neck compression during restraint, blunt trauma, and underlying natural disease. Since chest/neck compression, natural disease (e.g., atherosclerosis), blunt trauma, and excited delirium are not mutually exclusive, all may be present in one death. The forensic pathologist's role is to determine what caused and/or contributed to the death. When attempting to determine the proximate cause of death in instances with multiple potential causes, determining the mechanism of death often is useful. As not all causes of death have pathologically-demonstrable mechanisms of death, examination of the circumstances of the death often are diagnostically important. The main goal of the autopsy of deaths suspected to be due to EDS is to identify (or exclude) intervening diseases or injuries sufficient to explain the death in the context of the investigated circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.