Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24526399›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2014

Development of a reference artificial sediment for chemical testing adapted to the MELA sediment contact assay.

Florane Le Bihanic, Prescilla Perrichon, Laure Landi, Christelle Clérandeau, Karyn Le Menach, Hélène Budzinski, Xavier Cousin, Jérôme Cachot

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Release of anthracene from estuarine sediments by crab bioturbation effects.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PAHs and fish--exposure monitoring and adverse effects--from molecular to individual level.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Florane Le BihanicUniversity of Bordeaux, EPOC UMR CNRS 5805, 33405, avenue des Facultés, Talence Cedex, France.
Prescilla Perrichon
Laure Landi
Christelle Clérandeau
Karyn Le Menach
Hélène Budzinski
Xavier Cousin
Jérôme Cachot
Environnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRFish Physiology and Genomics Institute · FRIfremer · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most persistent organic pollutants, due to their hydrophobic properties, accumulate in aquatic sediments and represent a high risk for sediment quality. To assess the toxicity of hydrophobic pollutants, a novel approach was recently proposed as an alternative to replace, refine and reduce animal experimentation: the medaka embryo-larval sediment contact assay (MELAc). This assay is performed with Japanese medaka embryos incubated on a natural sediment spiked with the compound being tested. With the aim of improving this assay, our study developed a reference exposure protocol with an artificial sediment specifically designed to limit natural sediment composition uncertainties and preparation variability. The optimum composition of the new artificial sediment was tested using a model polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH), fluoranthene. The sediment was then validated with two other model PAHs, benz[a]anthracene and benzo[a]pyrene. Various developmental end points were recorded, including survival, embryonic heartbeat, hatching delay, hatching success, larval biometry and abnormalities. The final artificial sediment composition was set at 2.5 % dry weight (dw) Sphagnum peat, 5 % dw kaolin clay and 92.5 % dw silica of 0.2- to 0.5-mm grain size. In contrast with natural sediments, the chemical components of this artificial matrix are fully defined and readily identifiable. It is totally safe for fish embryos and presents relatively high sorption capacities for hydrophobic compounds. Studies with other hydrophobic and metallic contaminants and mixtures should be performed to further validate this artificial sediment.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological AssayGeologic SedimentsLarvaOryziasPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID24526399
OpenAlexW2078484184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.