Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24526260›Full record

ReviewPhotosynthesis research2015

Engineering cyanobacteria as photosynthetic feedstock factories.

Stephanie G Hays, Daniel C Ducat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Photosynthesis research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Improving the Transformation Efficiency ofACS synthetic biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Mixed Culture Cultivation in Microbial Bioprocesses.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reprogramming the metabolism ofSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  16. Heterologous Production of Glycine Betaine UsingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephanie G HaysDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Daniel C Ducat

Funding

Harvard Systems Biology Graduate ProgramT32GM080177 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI MITCHISON, TIMOTHY J, MURRAY, ANDREW W · 2010 to 2019
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM080177NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM080177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbohydrate feedstocks are at the root of bioindustrial production and are needed in greater quantities than ever due to increased prioritization of renewable fuels with reduced carbon footprints. Cyanobacteria possess a number of features that make them well suited as an alternative feedstock crop in comparison to traditional terrestrial plant species. Recent advances in genetic engineering, as well as promising preliminary investigations of cyanobacteria in a number of distinct production regimes have illustrated the potential of these aquatic phototrophs as biosynthetic chassis. Further improvements in strain productivities and design, along with enhanced understanding of photosynthetic metabolism in cyanobacteria may pave the way to translate cyanobacterial theoretical potential into realized application.

Indexed as

BiofuelsBiomassCarbohydratesCyanobacteriaGenetic EngineeringPhotosynthesisBiofuelsCarbohydrates

Identifiers

PMID24526260
PMCPMC5851442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.