Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24526247›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2014

Do analgesics improve functioning in patients with chronic low back pain? An explorative triple-blinded RCT.

Henrica R Schiphorst Preuper, Jan H B Geertzen, Marten van Wijhe, Anne M Boonstra, Barbara H W Molmans, Pieter U Dijkstra, Michiel F Reneman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02146482 (Evaluating Change in Back Pain From Access to a Sit-stand Workstation), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02146482 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluating Change in Back Pain From Access to a Sit-stand Workstation

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2013 to 2014Enrolled57ConditionsLow Back Pain, Back PainArmsSit-stand computer workstation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Paracetamol for low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Pharmacological management of chronic low back pain in older patients: a randomized controlled trial of the effect of pregabalin and opioid administration.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2015
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Henrica R Schiphorst PreuperDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO box 30.002, 9750 RA, Haren, The Netherlands, h.r.schiphorst.preuper@umcg.nl.
Jan H B Geertzen
Marten van Wijhe
Anne M Boonstra
Barbara H W Molmans
Pieter U Dijkstra
Michiel F Reneman
University of Groningen · NLCornelia-Stichting · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTREATMENT of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) aims to reduce disability, improve functional capacity, and participation. Time contingent prescription of analgesics is a treatment modality in CLBP. The impact of analgesics on functional capacity is unknown. Aim of the study was to explore the effect of analgesics on functioning measured by functional capacity evaluation, and self-reported disability in patients with CLBP.

methodsExplorative Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial was performed in an outpatient pain rehabilitation setting on patients waiting for rehabilitation. Included patients had low back pain lasting >3 months, visual analogue scale worst pain ≥4.0 cm, and age >18 years. Outcome measures before (T0) and after treatment (T1): functional capacity, pain intensity, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. T1: global perceived pain relief. Patient characteristics and psychological questionnaires were assessed. Fifty patients were included in this study and were randomly assigned to 2 weeks treatment or placebo. TREATMENT: acetaminophen/tramadol 325 mg/37.5 mg per capsule. Dose: maximum acetaminophen 1,950 mg and tramadol 225 mg per day; treatment and placebo titrated identically. Compliance and side-effects were monitored. TREATMENT effects between groups over time were compared.

resultsOne patient (treatment group) was lost to follow-up. Forty-nine patients remained in the study. TREATMENT effects in primary outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. A subgroup of 10 (42%) patients (treatment group) reported global pain relief (responders) who reduced self-reported disability (p < 0.05). Responders had significantly lower catastrophizing scores.

conclusionOverall treatment effects were small and non-significant. A subgroup, however, reported improved functioning as a result of treatment. Responders had lower catastrophizing scores.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAdultAnalgesicsChronic PainDisability EvaluationDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleDrug CombinationsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRecovery of FunctionAcetaminophenAnalgesicsDrug CombinationsTramadol

Identifiers

PMID24526247
PMCPMC3960442
OpenAlexW2075903809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.