Review: epidemiology and pathophysiology of atypical femur fractures.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Osteoporosis and Fracture Risk among Older US Asian Adults.Current osteoporosis reports · 2023
   Review
2. ATYPICAL FEMORAL FRACTURES DUE TO THE USE OF BISPHOSPHONATES: EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY IN A TERTIARY HOSPITAL.Acta ortopedica brasileira · 2022
   Article
3. Reliability and diagnostic utility of radiographs in patients with incomplete atypical femoral fractures.Skeletal radiology · 2019
   Article
4. A proposal for an atypical femur fracture treatment and prevention clinical practice guideline.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
   Review
5. The association of race/ethnicity and risk of atypical femur fracture among older women receiving oral bisphosphonate therapy.Bone · 2016
   Article
6. Atypical femoral fracture due to chronic use of bisphosphonates: case report.Revista brasileira de ortopedia
   Article
7. The Epidemiology of Metatarsal Fractures Among Older Females With Bisphosphonate Exposure.The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as