Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24526114›Full record

ReviewCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2014

Revisiting p53 for cancer-specific chemo- and radiotherapy: ten years after.

Jason M Beckta, Syed Farhan Ahmad, Hu Yang, Kristoffer Valerie

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jason M BecktaDepartment of Radiation Oncology; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond, VA USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond, VA USA.
Syed Farhan AhmadDepartment of Radiation Oncology; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond, VA USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond, VA USA.
Hu YangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond, VA USA; Massey Cancer Center; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond, VA USA.
Kristoffer ValerieDepartment of Radiation Oncology; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond, VA USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond, VA USA; Massey Cancer Center; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond, VA USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USUniversity of Richmond · USVCU Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

ATM as target for malignant glioma radiosensitization.R01NS064593 · NINDS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI VALERIE, KRISTOFFER CARL · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
Targeting invasion and DNA DSB repair in glioma with a multi-pronged approach.R21CA156995 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI VALERIE, KRISTOFFER CARL · 2011 to 2012
$358k
ATM Controls Genomic Stability in Pluripotent Stem CellsF30CA171893 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI BECKTA, JASON MARK · 2012 to 2014
$101k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA171893NCI NIH HHS F30CA171893NCI NIH HHS R21 CA156995NCI NIH HHS R21CA156995NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064593NINDS NIH HHS R01NS064593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite intense studies, highly effective therapeutic strategies against cancer have not yet been fully exploited, because few true cancer-specific targets have been identified. Most modalities, perhaps with the exception of radiation therapy, target proliferating cells, which are also abundant in normal tissues. Thus, most current cancer treatments have significant side effects. More than 10 years ago, the tumor suppressor p53 was first explored as a cancer-specific target. At the time, the approach was to introduce a normal p53 gene into mutant p53 (mp53) tumor cells to induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. However, this strategy did not hold up and mostly failed in subsequent clinical studies. Recent research developments have now returned p53 to the limelight. Several studies have reported that mutant or null p53 tumor cells undergo apoptosis more easily than genetically matched, normal p53 counterparts when inhibiting a specific stress kinase in combination with standard chemotherapy or when exposed to an ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase inhibitor and radiation, thus achieving true cancer specificity in animal tumor models. This short review highlights several of these recent studies, discusses possible mechanism(s) for mp53-mediated "synthetic lethality," and the implications for cancer therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsGenetic TherapyHumansMutationNeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Antineoplastic AgentsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsTumor Suppressor Protein p53ATMDNA damage responseDNA repairMAPKAP kinase 2p38

Identifiers

PMID24526114
PMCPMC3979907
OpenAlexW2061432651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.