ArticleScientific reports2014
Spontaneous symmetry breaking in interdependent networked game.
Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spontaneous symmetry breaking of cooperation between species.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Networks of reliable reputations and cooperation: a review.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Review
- The influence of heterogeneous learning ability on the evolution of cooperation.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Individual diversity between interdependent networks promotes the evolution of cooperation by means of mixed coupling.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Environment-based preference selection promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Partial Shocks on Cooperative Multiplex Networks with Varying Degrees of Noise.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Inequality as information: Wealth homophily facilitates the evolution of cooperation.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Aspiration-based coevolution of link weight promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game.Royal Society open science · 2018Article
- Evolution of Cooperation with Heterogeneous Conditional Cooperators.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Intermediate Levels of Network Heterogeneity Provide the Best Evolutionary Outcomes.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Voluntary Vaccination through Self-organizing Behaviors on Locally-mixed Social Networks.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Win-stay-lose-learn promotes cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game with voluntary participation.PloS one · 2017Article
- Article
- The coevolution of overconfidence and bluffing in the resource competition game.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Utility Evaluation Based on One-To-N Mapping in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game for Interdependent Networks.PloS one · 2016Article
- Reputation-Based Investment Helps to Optimize Group Behaviors in Spatial Lattice Networks.PloS one · 2016Article
- Multiple effect of social influence on cooperation in interdependent network games.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Multi-frequency complex network from time series for uncovering oil-water flow structure.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Quantifying the Role of Homophily in Human Cooperation Using Multiplex Evolutionary Game Theory.PloS one · 2015Article
- Heterogeneous Coupling between Interdependent Lattices Promotes the Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatial evolution game has traditionally assumed that players interact with direct neighbors on a single network, which is isolated and not influenced by other systems. However, this is not fully consistent with recent research identification that interactions between networks play a crucial rule for the outcome of evolutionary games taking place on them. In this work, we introduce the simple game model into the interdependent networks composed of two networks. By means of imitation dynamics, we display that when the interdependent factor α is smaller than a threshold value α(C), the symmetry of cooperation can be guaranteed. Interestingly, as interdependent factor exceeds α(C), spontaneous symmetry breaking of fraction of cooperators presents itself between different networks. With respect to the breakage of symmetry, it is induced by asynchronous expansion between heterogeneous strategy couples of both networks, which further enriches the content of spatial reciprocity. Moreover, our results can be well predicted by the strategy-couple pair approximation method.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.